Fox Frying Pan to Twitter Cyber Fire
Part 1 — Tucker Carlson’s Leap from Murdoch’s Fox News to Musk’s Twitter 2.0
Former Māori Television news and current affairs editor, Steve ‘Snoopman’ Edwards, explores the many reasons why Fox News suddenly nixed Tucker Carlson’s prime time show in April and his next move to Elon Musk’s ‘feedback media’ platform, Twitter. He finds Musk’s X-Corp is part of a techno-feudalist empire.
This essay locates the many vested interests with a reason to nix Tucker Carlson’s Fox show, at a delicate time for the Global Power Élite as various factions re-align to gain control over the territories, technologies and treasures to manufacture the chip — since big data is the new oil. The chip is the new instrument of empire expansion.
Yet, the ‘Snoopman’ notes that the Big Media and Big Tech ‘rebels’ — Carlson and Musk — do not hover directly over the targets of the ruling power élite.
Set against the backdrop of a ‘Censorship Industrial Complex’ in a rapidly changing media scape, amid the ‘Fourth Industrial Revolution’ — he finds that Carlson’s announced move to Musk’s Twitter is fraught in the present cancel culture climate.
Tucker’s Wrap Sheet — Phony or Gritty?
Cancelled Fox News talk show host, Tucker Carlson, announced Wednesday May 10 2023 on Twitter that he and his crew are planning to newscast in the Twitter-verse.
In the 24 hours that Carlson stated the news media system is a propaganda system — the video clocked up 117 million views. The in-limbo Fox News host said every journalist in every English language newsroom knows they are limited by what can’t be said, meaning the news media lies by omission. This corrupts a free society, he said.
In response to Tucker’s Twitter podcast tweet, Twitter CEO Elon Musk tweeted later, stated, “On this platform, unlike the one-way street of broadcast, people are able to interact, critique and refute whatever he or anyone may say.”
“I also want to be clear”, Musk added, “that we have not signed a deal of any kind whatsoever. Tucker is subject to the same rules & rewards of all content creators.”
Twitter — which was de-listed from the New York Stock Exchange November 8 2022 — merged with X Holdings II on October 27, and no longer exists as Twitter Inc. In turn, X Holdings II is owned by Musk’s parent company, X Holdings I Corporation (X-Corp), owns Tesla, The Boring Co., SpaceX, and Neuralink, among other properties.
In his May 10 Tweet-video, Tucker Carlson acknowledged one problem with Twitter when he said that because Big Media are huge producers of “thinly disguised propaganda”, their content dominated the discourses on Twitter. This situation produced faux debates because the gatekeepers of the Big Media were still in charge, Mr Carlson said. Like an earnest echo of the First Amendment, he finished, saying:
“Free speech is the main right that you have. Without it you no others.”
The sudden cancelling of Carlson, Monday April 24 2023, from Fox News after 13 years and following a stint on MSNBC and having landed at CNN in 2000 — demonstrated the woes of America’s media cartel as its news market tanks amid a content explosion.
The ‘Big Six American’ corporations — Comcast NBC Universal, Disney, CBS, AT&T, News Corp and Viacom — each own news properties that dominate 90% of America’s media market, and comprise six of the nine top-tier media corporations of the world’s Global Media Cartel. And all operate under the long shadow of the JFK Assassination, since that was the watershed moment when America’s media shied away from investigating big conspiracies, as then-New York University Media, Communications and Propaganda Professor Mark Crispin Miller stated in a 2018 podcast.
Ironically, two days after Tucker’s “We’re back” tweet, the hire of NBC Universal’s ad and sales chief, Linda Yaccarino, as the new CEO for Twitter, became world news.
On November 11 2022, Ad Age reported that Yaccarino, considered a “major force” on Madison Avenue, said “there is no surrogate for Twitter” and she was not ready to bet against its new owner, Elon Musk. She believed Musk could “learn advertising”.
It would appear Musk’s recent appearances at advertising conferences in Miami and California were strategic tactics to re-win confidence of the advertising industry, big media players and their clients, in a corporate landscape dominated by monopoly board cartels with interlocked directorships, competing and colluding as factions.
Yaccarino had previously expressed admiration for Twitter, calling the platform “the single, No. 1 biggest” content distribution partner for NBC Universal at an ad industry event soon after Mr. Musk took over the company. Musk indicated publicly that the company lost revenue as advertisers fled the platform after his takeover.
The New York Times, whose top ten owners include Vanguard, Blackrock and State Street, reported Yaccarino and Mr. Musk appear aligned on political issues — such as “a more permissive approach toward speech on Twitter” — that are central to his vision for the platform. Amusingly, Gotham City’s most famous newspaper also said Yaccarino is “a conservative and a critic of so-called woke discourse”, a term used by conservatives to describe the censorious elements of left-wing social progressives.
At a Miami media conference in April, Musk said that “there’s legitimate concerns that advertisers have that I want to hear.” He recalled an anecdote regarding a complaint he had heard from David Zaslav, the chief executive of Warner Brother’s Discovery channel. Mr Zaslav was frustrated that he was unable to place ads for “White Lotus,” the hit HBO show, next to discussions of “White Lotus” on Twitter.
Musk said the problem had “been fixed”. Yaccarino added, “So, it’s a new beginning.”
This exchange implies an algorithms solution, since twits got excited about a White Lotus scene featuring gay sex, which afforded the opportunity to type “rimming”, the informal verb for anilingus, or licking and kissing the anus, and the noun commonly referred to as “ass” — on the Twitter threads for the White Lotus.
It turns out that prior to Yaccarino appearing with the new owner of the feedback media giant, she received an email by Rob Norman, a former executive at the ad giant WPP. Ostensibly, he wanted to know if Ms. Yaccarino had seen the op-ed in The New York Times he wrote after Mr. Musk bought Twitter last year. Mr Norman, who pointed out he had represented the world’s biggest buyer of advertising space, stated that Musk had placed no limits on his own speech since he had bought Twitter and said the debate raged: “Is Twitter in the Musk era a safe place for advertisers?”
Norman had cited an example of Musk’s errant ways. Musk had amplified misinformation, he said, related to an attack on Paul Pelosi, the husband of Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi. Mr. Musk’s tweet included a link to an article from the Santa Monica Observer, which alleged that Mr. Pelosi was drunk and in a fight with a male prostitute. The mainstream media narrative deemed the story false, and so Musk deleted the tweet. Days earlier, Musk had stated that Twitter “cannot become a free-for-all hellscape.” Norman’s complaint was that Musk was tone deaf to advertisers.
Intriguingly, Mr Norman, added “Advertisers exercise caution in their choice of media if they perceive a risk to their reputations. Advertisers don’t like losing sleep over guilt by association and tolerate the possibility of harm only if the opportunity forgone is too great.” The former ad giant executive was warning that the exodus from Musk’s newly acquired feedback media platform would get more of such ‘feedback’ if he failed to moderate his ‘speech’ on Twitter.
Norman was, in essence, also admitting that advertisers can act as a filter on the news media, as described by the second filter of the Propaganda Model, as developed by media critics Noam Chomsky and Edward S. Herman in their 1988 book, Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media.
The Propaganda Model is comprised of five news filters through which news is processed for mass consumption: [1] size, ownership and profit orientation; [2] advertising; [3] expert sources; [4] flak and the enforcers; and [5] ideology.
A sixth filter, ‘buying out’ — that I developed while researching my thesis “It’s the financial oligarchy, stupid” for a post-grad communications degree — is added to model for the potential of corruption, collusion and conspiracy in newsrooms.
Similarly, these filters apply to the big tech’s social media platforms that are perhaps better called ‘feedback media’, since the content is created by billions of humans (and bots) who are providing ‘feedback’ in a rapidly transforming system.
Carlson’s planned move to Twitter, I contend, heightens the risk for his new mission.
It seems since practically everyone has weighed in to interpret what happened, why Carlson mattered, or how Fox News might have just ‘taken one for the team’ to leave the entire American Establishment free to escalate global tensions.
On Monday 23 May, Tucker’s twitter account retweeted a tweet by Chadwick Moore, the author of a soon to be released book titled Tucker. In the accompanying video, Mr Moore says he has been told by sources at Fox that the real reason Tucker was fired was that Dominion Voting demanded Fox jettison the host as a condition of a legal settlement. Numerous Fox news anchors, journalists and hosts had claimed that voter fraud had swung the election against the incumbent president Trump.
Yet, numerous counter-voices have pointed out that Tucker Carlson was skeptical about the stance taken by others at Fox News that voter fraud had swung the election. Vanity Fair’s Gabriel Sherman reported that Fox News anchor Maria Bartiromo hyped Dominion conspiracy theories far more than Carlson.
On former Fox host Megan Kelly’s podcast, co-host of the Ink-Stained Wretches podcast, Eliana Johnsonn, asked the obvious question: if Dominion Voting really demanded Fox fire carlson, why keep it a secret?
In announcing his move to Twitter, Tucker and his allies are upping the ante. This may be to gain leverage over Fox to exit his contract with Fox, which may otherwise prevent him from pursuing his venture on Twitter with members of Fox team.
The answer may also be that Democrats may have leaned on Dominion Voting to get rid of Tucker, because he had exposed the footage showing the Capitol Hill January 6th ‘Insurrection’ was not only blown out of proportion. But, also Carlson alleged a policeman was shown to be walking around inside the Capitol foyer at a time when he was supposed to have been killed, and that there appeared to be an agent provocateur.
In unequivocal terms, Tucker Carlson stated his team had reviewed the released raw footage that proved the January 6th ‘Insurrection’ was neither an insurrection nor deadly. Yet, Carlson stated the news media told viewers that was the case, almost as if the narrative and selection of images was coordinated. The former Fox news host also described the thousands of people that gathered there were mostly peaceful and were protesting the ‘UniParty’, a descriptor for the widespread view that the Democrat and Republican parties act as an Establishment, rather than for their constituents.
Among his secular sins, Mr Carlson interviewed US Presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. five days prior to Tucker Carlson Tonight’s abrupt cancellation and his program essentially becoming ‘Tucker Carlson Goodnight’. Immediately before he interviewed Bobby Kennedy, Carlson delivered one of his characteristically acerbic monologues. However, he not only showed up the competing and colluding networks for pimping out Big Pharma’s corona injecticide — as a way to introduce his guest.
Mr Kennedy, after all, had been outspoken throughout the Great Corona Hostage Crisis over the totalitarian Medical Martial Laws imposed, while Mr Carlson had pointed out such ironies as the left-leaning American media outlets characterizing the George Floyd protests as peaceful. Meanwhile, numerous American cities burned.
Ironically, the anti-lockdown protests, as Carlson reported in 2020, received scathing treatment because such mortals dared to challenge the sacred corona narrative.
On April 19, while introducing Kennedy, Carlson stated that news audiences should not trust the news media since their major advertisers were the same major pharmaceutical manufacturers that had produced the corona ‘vaccines’. Carlson said such ‘vaccines’ had subsequently been proven to be unsafe.
And that Robert Kennedy Jr had warned people that the injecticides would not be properly safety tested, and his warnings were proven to be sound, Carlson said, despite being cast as a ‘conspiracy theorist’. RFK Jr himself said there was a corrupt merger between corporate and state power that is transforming America into a corporate plutocracy characterized by cushy socialism for the rich and a brutal merciless capitalism for the poor, that bails out banks amid a permanent state of war, while printing 10 centuries worth of money in the past 14 years.
But, was interviewing this presidential candidate Carlson’s only ‘secular sin’?
There have been many reasons, contributing factors and excuses pitched since Carlson was ‘fired’ under the cover of public relations spin that the two parties “agreed to part ways”, as Fox laundered the event. The excuses range from scape-goating Carlson after Fox’s owner NewsCorp lost a lawsuit over calling Arizona for Trump too early in November 2020, to slurring the talk show host as a transphobic, sexist, racist lying, bullying conspiracy theorist who incites violence.
Ironically, when Tucker Carlson interviewed Russell Brand on his daytime program, they discussed the situation where huge corporations had colonized many left-liberal causes, which meant through sponsorship such dissident voices were constrained.
Yet, are we being asked to believe Carlson has an impressive wrap-sheet with his program, to cast him out among the independents as a schill on a managed platform?
He lands punches. His darts hit near the board’s center. Egos get bruised. But, big players never get knocked-out. Targets don’t get mortally wounded by a balls-eye hit.
Last December, when Carlson called out US President Joe Biden (and Donald Trump) for refusing to sign-off on the final release of classified documents held by the CIA pertaining to the JFK Assassination, the Fox News host referred to the deployment of the once little used term ‘conspiracy theory’. Carlson cited Professor Lance de Haven-Smith’s book, Conspiracy Theory in America, to point out that the New York Times published five stories in which ‘conspiracy theory’ appeared in 1964, the year the President’s JFK Assassination Commission released its fraudulent 888-page report, as a derogatory slight to quell skepticism about the official narrative peddled.
In response to Biden over-riding a 1993 law of Congress, Carlson said his team contacted a person with deep familiarity about the documents withheld by the CIA, to ask if the Central Intelligence Agency was involved in the JFK Assassination.
Tucker Carlson Tonight’s source reportedly said, “The answer is yes. I believe they were involved. It’s a whole different country from what we thought it was. It’s all fake.”
Mr Carlson went on to say that former CIA Director and Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo, declined to be interviewed, pointing out that the West Point Military Academy graduate, usually made time to come on his show.
In response to Carlson’s ‘CIA & JFK’ report, Robert F. Kennedy Jr tweeted that Carlson’s newscast was the bravest in 60 years. In a sense, it is testimony to the over-arching conspiracy denialism that dominates the life of the remnant 1st American Republic. Yet, Carlson’s ‘CIA & JFK’ truth-bombing barely scratched the surface.
Perhaps seeing the writing on the metaphorical wall of a workplace that identifies as a newsroom owned by a behemoth corporation called News Corporation, Carlson has appeared on several independent podcasts. These appearances include Redacted hosted by Natalie and Clayton Morris formerly of CBS and Fox, respectively; and on Ruthless where he said facetiously he’d probably run for President if he was “the last person on Earth”; and on the Happy Dad Seltzer franchise-sponsored Fullsend Podcast, Mr Carlson boasted to his fan boy hosts that he had an ‘insider’ pedigree; and on the Charlie Kirk Show, Carlson said Hungary was a freer society than America, because you can’t publicly question the administration’s key policies without losing your job.
Carlson told Adam Carolla that he came away inspired at his garage podcast studio after an interview four years prior. Tucker also said to Mr Morris in February 2023 that he was willing to take the risk of getting fired rather than censoring himself.
So, is it likely a cumulative maelstrom of interests representing competing rivalrous factions, converged to put the heat on News Corp to get their most popular news ‘host’ cancelled? And was Tucker Carlson Tonight viewed as a loose cannon for the ‘Sects of Orthodoxy’ who battle for control in an escalating narrative complete with plot twists?
The canning of Carlson’s show meant the ‘host’ and his team couldn’t broadcast a finale edition in Fox’s secular cathedral. A swang-song show might’ve been risky.
For example, when Glenn Beck was essentially ‘fired’ in 2011, the ‘host’ laid it on thick in his last show why he was being taken off air. He said his audience knew why, and added that they’d know there was one media company they could not trust, and then he gazed at the direction of the ‘Live’ Fox News box in the bottom left corner. He spoke of America’s heroes, saying some who appear on the US Federal Reserve cash did not deserve to be there, while others earned their place and his admiration.
While Mr Beck did not say explicitly why, he had aired pre-recorded shows that had presented the ways in which the Federal Reserve System of central banks caused America’s economic problems. Yet, the liberal media such as ABC focussed on an exodus of 300 advertisers, and a ratings drop of 30% in a year. Podcasting host Cenk Uygur at The Young Turks, added Beck thought himself God’s gift to humanity.
Therefore, before Beck’s last Fox show, which aired June 30th 2011, media coverage focussed on his mistakes or surface differences, and the turf wars between liberals and conservatives, rather than the investigations revealing hidden power structures.
It turns out that Glen Beck hosted a show on Friday 25 March 2011 in which he presented a summarized history of banking dynasties seeking to financially enslave the free enterprise states of America with various central bank incarnations. In this episode, Beck stated the Federal Reserve is a privately-owned banking cartel with a monopoly market over the US currency, while Americans unwittingly pay income tax to service the interest on the public debt. He interviewed the author of The Creature from Jekyll Island: A Second Look at the Federal Reserve. Despite its merits, G. Edward Griffin did not mention Eustace Mullins’ The Secret of the Federal Reserve, which does name the shareholders, and included charts detailing a ‘London Connection’.
Carlson, it seems, eventually came around to the same ideas about the dangers of being locked into the financial equivalent of a nuclear arms race with hostile powers.
The ‘trust baby’ talk-show host — who became a beneficiary of the Swanson’s TV dinners fortune after his father remarried — interviewed a financial advisor Catherine Austin Fitts, about the looming Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) system. Fitts, who used to work for the federal government, said the CBDCs are intended to place central banks at the center of a financial transaction control grid. Central banks are poised to program money as a means of social control, Fitts warned.
Yet, unlike Glen Beck, Tucker Carlson had not hovered directly above the target of the Federal Reserve, whose rules for the structure on the Board of Governors’ website read like a playbook where the banker in the end always wins the game of Monopoly.
Except, it’s not so funny if you have read Eustace Mullins’ book, The Secrets of the Federal Reserve: The London Connection, which shows the links of the banks, trusts and dynastic families that own the Fed. And you realize that the governors’ headquarters is essentially located in District 13, Washington D.C, since there are twelve regional Fed Banks. Thus, Monopoly begins to look like ‘The Remnant Republic Edition’ in a prequel to The Hunger Games, where 13 districts comprise a totalitarian super-state.
Nor has Carlson turned in a solid investigation on the 9/11 Coup D’état. Carlson — like the rest of the prominent public figures in the American media cartel — has been obtuse on the facts that show the US Government’s official narrative is implausible.
On the Adam Carolla Show, April 3 of 2023, Tucker said he asked on CNN’s Crossfire, why would 19 terrorists wittingly commit suicide and he was told to “shut-up”.
Recently, Tucker said on the Redacted podcast that it’s essentially heretical to ask what happened to the World Trade Center’s Building 7. This is a shift in position from his previous dismissive rudeness toward 9/11 Truthers, who he regarded as “parasites”.
Professional group Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth) state that Building 7 — which was not hit by a plane — could not have collapsed due to office fires. The 47-storey building was the third building that ‘collapsed’ at near-free fall speed in seven seconds, at 5:20pm, or ‘just in time’ for the end of the business day.
Swiss historian Daniele Ganser teaches in his 9/11 Perspectives Master Class, that because Building 7 collapsed at free-fall speed for the first two seconds of its destruction, this meant there was no mass slowing the force of gravity. Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, Ganser informs his classes, say the simultaneous symmetrical collapse would have required pre-cut columns and pre-planted computer timed explosives to bring the tower down on its own footprint.
Thus, the entire official 9/11 account itself collapses under scrutiny, Ganser said.
In his excellent book, Another Nineteen: Investigating Legitimate 9/11 Suspects, Kevin Ryan links many of his key suspects to the means to pull off such an epic, brazen exhibition of blockbuster live terror theater. Ryans’ account is deeply dark doom.
Ironically, the same Gotham software that Peter Thiels’s Palantir developed — with $2 million from the CIA’s venture capital arm, In-Q-Tel — to locate Al Qaeda terrorists, could be used to link the suspects of the transnational deep state network that Kevin Ryan presents in his book. After all, Elon Musk and Peter Thiel have the brains.
Therefore, it’s fair to say that the infamous conflicts-of-interest ‘revolving doors’ between Washington and the Wall Street-Military-Industrial-Think-Tank Complex is really a portal to a parallel universe where the ‘shadow government’ conjures crimes.
As you would expect, Carlson didn’t make Ryan’s suspects list. Therefore, Tucker can’t be much of an ‘insider’, and he needs to school-up with 9/11 hard copy books.
That said, Carlson seems to be viewed by the global élite as a loose cannon, since he was about the only one on American mainstream television dropping truth bombs.
There are many other examples on his wrap-sheet that construct ‘renegade kudos’.
The week before his firing, Tucker ironically filed a segment titled ‘Let Them Eat Bugs’, to inform viewers that the drive to get the West to ingest insects was a United Nations-World Economic Forum agenda. Naturally, Tucker’s point of difference was that newsrooms simultaneously lied suddenly by omitting the origins of this agenda.
Yet, Mr Carlson failed to point out that it is the norm — in a world awash with think-tanks, working in cahoots with the prototype World Government Organization (the UN) — for workplaces that identify as newsrooms, to act as plagiarizing pimps for their fellow professional class quislings in service of a factional, yet global oligarchy.
Dutch activist Eva Vlaardingerbroek said “it’s a compliance test” because if politicians can get humans to eat insects, they’ll have control over humans via food.
In filing this ‘Let Them Eat Bugs’ series, Tucker Swanson Carlson may have fried Fox’s ties with the powerful ‘WEF-Blackrock-ESG’ faction. On Facts Matter, Roman Balmakov responded to his viewers, who pointed out the ubiquitous institutional investor, Blackrock, has a $1.5 billion stake in Fox. Balmakov referred to a Forbes article that highlighted how many of Tucker’s stories were critical of the ESG agenda. ESG is promoted by the World Economic Forum (WEF) members, which include figures such as Blackrock CEO, Larry Fink, and Klaus Schwab, founder of WEF.
ESG’s refers to Environmental, Social and Governance metrics, or quotas, that score companies on their compliance or efforts to fuse their workplace practices, policies and plans with ecological sustainability, gender diversity and governance structures deemed socially progressive, according to ratings agencies, such as Standard & Poors.
In one segment, Mr Carlson sardonically referred to the WEF cliqué in Davos Switzerland as “our Lizard Overlords” to introduce a singer, who he mocked. While she would have fitted in better at a WOMAD festival, Tucker’s antics clashed with Fox’s internal ESG reports, seeking to align with racial diversity and inclusion efforts.
Balmakov interviewed Kevin Stocklin, the producer of the 2022 ESG investigative documentary, The Shadow State, to comment on the power of asset managers, such as Blackrock, which manages $11 trillion in funds, to forward the ESG agenda.
Stocklin said there’s three ways that a company such as Blackrock could affect change in a firm like Fox. One way was via shareholder votes, where stockholders may attempt to get a racial equity audit. Shareholders like Blackrock, Vanguard and State Street can vote on the result. A second way may be a private meeting between asset managers and executives of a company to go over concerns. A third way, is an asset manager, such as Larry Fink, produces an annual letter to CEOs to set out preferences on, for instance, sustainability. Such ‘giant squid’ companies as Blackrock also build coalitions with ESG rating agencies, and their members, to influence in concert.
Carlson also had challenged the legitimacy of indicting Wikileaks founder Julian Assange under the 1917 Espionage Act, for receiving and publishing incriminating material about the US Government during the 9/11 Wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Carlson, who interviewed Julian Assange’s father in March 2023, belatedly realized the persecution of Assange did not bode well for a free press and the 1st Amendment.
After his departure, Joe Rogan and his guest Dave Smith viewed Carlson as a maverick who was the only high profile cable guy offering thoughtful controversial views amid mind-bending turbulence. Rogan said Carlson, as a wild card, could make a platform.
Russell Brand interviewed former Carlson co-worker, Saager Enjeti, who alleged Rupert Murdoch was angry over Carlson playing footage of the so-called January 6th 2020 ‘deadly insurrection’ that showed scenes at odds with the orthodoxy. Brand noted that Carlson platformed anti-establishment left-leaning figures, such as Glenn Greenwald, Aaron Maté and Jimmy Dores. Mr Brand suggested the Liberal Establishment’s beef with Carlson isn’t really about surface identity politics. The famous English comedian quoted extensively an independent journalist, Jonathan Cook, who pointed out that Carlson had become a loose cannon when he wrote:
“[I]f Carlson’s firing by Murdoch suggests anything, who it is that the corporate media had grown increasingly fearful of the extent to which Carlson was becoming a loose cannon, and that the kind of independent journalism he hosted and amplified was gaining traction.”
The controversial talk show ‘host’ had also spoken out about how American citizens get charged for murder or attempted murder for shooting recidivist criminals who either assault, rob, or kill them. Carlson, who regularly pulled 3.5 million viewers a night, also called out Big Pharma’s dirtiest secret: psychotropic prescription drugs as the hidden common causative factor driving mass shooters to mayhem.
And Carlson also reported the ‘conspiracy theory’ about Ukraine having US-funded biolabs turned out to be true, when Victoria Nuland, the Under Secretary for Political Affairs at the US State Department, said the facilities could fall into Russia’s hands.
The Fox News host recently stated that Americans had the right to know their Government is embroiled in a “hot war” with a nuclear power — Russia. Biden previously claimed no US troops were involved in fighting in Ukraine.
Carlson interviewed Glenn Greenwald — who scooped Edward Snowden’s NSA Leaks story — over the Washington Post and the New York Times revealing the identity of a whistleblower, who exposed the cover-up of American troops directly fighting in a hot war with Russia inside Ukraine. Greenwald explained to Tucker that following the ‘Ukraine Docs’ leak, the Washington Post and the New York Times in effect did the identification work for the FBI, when they exposed a 21-year-old member of the intelligence wing of the Massachusetts Air National Guard, Jack Teixeira.
Ironically, Carlson’s popularity had grown not just with patriot conservatives. Carlson’s popularity grew with a cohort who can see that the divisive left-right paradigm is a smokescreen for a lurch to what RFK Jr calls ‘turn-key totalitarianism’.
But, have they mistakenly respected him for ‘doing his best’ to expand the discourse within a workplace that identifies as a newsroom? Carlson’s schtick of frowny-faced gormless-ness punctuated his rhetorical performances, like a clown faking constipation. Carlson’s entertainingly exaggerated bitchy-resting face communicated to his audience that the fat-cat élites were rubbing cat shit in their faces.
Such faces have been lampooned, suggesting they were intended to distract and manipulate his audience for the narcissistic purposes of a stereotyped racist, sexist bigoted Fox News host. Yet, while Carlson was firmly ensconced in the Great American Hollywood Media Cartel’s multi-season theatrical production of Democrats Vs Republicans — that goads Americans to squabble on the ‘Monkey See-Monkey Do’ Love-Hate Spectrum — he began to see the world’s ruling élites with more clarity.
Ironically, Carlson has been criticized as an élitist, who appears to root for America’s beleagured, divided and confused population, after he’s bragged he’s rich.
Upon his show’s end, Forbes magazine reported Tucker Carlson was paid between $15 to $20 million a year for his programming brand vehicle, Tucker Carlson Tonight.
In a 2003 C-Span interview, Carlson said Fox anchor Bill Maher’s ‘everyman’ populist schtick of rooting for regular people was inherently phony because he made millions as a talk show ‘host’. When the tables had turned, and it was Carlson who was fronting the prime-time 8pm spot on Fox, the talk-show ‘host’ lost his cool at a guest, Rutger Bregman, a Dutch historian. Bregman had called out the irony of World Economic Forum élites flying on 1500 jets to Davos to “hear David Attenborough speak about how we’re wrecking the planet”. Meanwhile, almost no one talked about tax avoidance of the rich, Bregman said during a panel at Davos, Switzerland, in January 2019.
Because the World Economic Forum panels are usually circle-jerking staged propaganda to manufacture élite consensus, the viral video resonated with an anti-establishment dining audience that Tucker fed off at TV dinner time.
Bregman accused Carlson of jumping on the bandwagon pretending to be “against the globalist élite blah, blah, blah”. The Dutch historian said Carlson was a “part of the problem … [because he was] a millionaire funded by billionaires”. Carlson reacted, saying to Bregman, “Why don’t you go fuck yourself, you tiny brain … moron”, before the taping was cut-off. The segment was never aired on Fox News.
Meanwhile, Carlson appears to have avoided presenting the total super-structure of the global élite. As I show in the Part 2, “What happened in Nicaragua stays in Nicaragua”, Tucker’s father, Richard, was director of Voice of America, a CIA broadcasting propaganda front that grew out of the WWII-era Office of Strategic Services (OSS), the fore-runner to the Central Intelligence Agency.
Thus, Tucker’s ‘trust baby’ pedigree is also CIA, making the cancelled Fox ‘host’ and the CIA ‘cousins-twice removed’. After all, the Heritage Foundation landed Tucker his first media job at the National Review, which was founded in 1955 by William F. Buckley, a CIA special agent, who was also one of the Vatican’s Maltese Knights.
That said, comedian-turned current affairs podcaster, Jimmy Dore, says Tucker appears to have become a risk for a cliqué that he calls the UniParty; a Democrat-Republican Establishment descriptor.
Some observers say the ‘UniParty’, had become really concerned not only about the fact that Tucker had used his Fox hole as a place to platform ‘dangerous’ counter-voices. But, also that Carlson’s editorializing monologues had political influence. For example, Grayzone journalist, Anya Parampil, reported March 20 2023 that Tucker Carlson was viewed as “the pro-war Uniparty’s single greatest foe,” because he not only had influence over Trump during his presidency. Parampil wrote:
“Carlson consistently attempted to reorient Trump toward his “America First” agenda throughout the latter’s time in the White House, using his show to offer principled critiques of the former president’s decision to bomb Syria, escalate regime change operations against Venezuela, and assassinate Iranian Major General Qasem Soleimani. In June of 2019, Carlson personally persuaded Trump to reject the advice of his national security team and elect not to retaliate against Iran over its decision to shoot down a US drone that had violated its sovereign airspace. The Fox host’s actions not only averted a deadly US military strike on Iran, but a potential regional war.”
In her piece headlined, “I am the “US-based Kremlin intermediary” that tried to help Tucker Carlson book an interview with Putin” (March 20 2023), Parampil also observed that the broad spectrum blitzkrieg to scapegoat Tucker was usually framed in terms of the culture wars and liberal-conservative turf narratives over the events of January 6th Protest. Parampil stated it was “neoconservative interventionists” who were a substantial driver of the ‘Target Tucker’ operation, because Carlson had become a vanguard for diplomacy over sparking wars that could easily escalate into WWIII.
To this end, Parampil put Carlson in touch with Russia’s Deputy Foreign Minister, Sergey Ryabkov, via an introductory email April 16 2021, because Carlson told her he had felt road-blocked in his attempts to gain an interview with Putin. On paper, it should have been easy for Carlson to be connected with Putin’s people. After all, in July 2018 Chris Wallace, then of Fox, had interviewed Putin, coinciding with a summit between President Trump and the Russian President in Helsinki, Finland.
However, despite initial contact between Ryabkov and Carlson, emails and texts between the pair and their staff were interrupted, and through this circumstance, Parampil assisted with passing on their communications to one another, the Grayzone journalist said. Then, on Fox News June 28, 2021, Carlson disclosed that a NSA whistleblower had contacted him saying the agency spied on his communications. Carlson said the NSA whistleblower, “repeated back to us information about a story that we are working on that could have only come directly from my texts and emails.”
Crucially, Carlson’s attempts to set-up an interview with Vladimir Putin was more than 10 months before Russia invaded Ukraine. As Parampil wrote, “at the time, I genuinely believed that a Tucker-Putin interview would have moved us closer to peace. Instead, we are currently positioned on the brink of nuclear war.”
The risk amplified when Fox News’ top rating host interviewed the Republican’s leading presidential contender, Donald Trump, April 12th. In the course of that interview, the former US President reiterated the lack of wisdom in antagonizing Russia, and pushing the nuclear power closer to China, while maintaining poor relations with North Korea, and watching major trading partners such as Saudi Arabia, join the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, Italy, China and South Africa) economic bloc.
Kim Iverson, formerly of The Hill, viewed the timing of the ‘firing’ following the Dominion Voting lawsuit — which was settled with Fox earlier that week for a jumbo $787 million — as a smokescreen for the real reason that Carlson was ‘fired’. Iverson believes that Carlson was really ‘fired’ by Rupert Murdoch — in consultation with the News Corp board — because he was the only MSM personality who elevated Trump and whose alleged ‘anti-war views’ would get an ear with the former President.
On comedian Jimmy Dore’s show, Grayzone journalist Aaron Maté played a clip of Carlson saying that the interests behind the big platforms such as Google would probably “crush me”. Carlson said in the short-term “the powers that be, will win” over “the powerless and hated”, with whom he identified.
Iverson also noted that many content creators have been de-monetized or de-platformed over posting critical analysis over January 6th or alleged voter fraud, because it leads directly to a heretical truth. Evidently, both the Democrat and Republican Establishment wanted the Trump Presidency upended, as well as any future attempts of ‘Orangeman’ to re-win the White House. By this reckoning, Carlson committed a cardinal sin, April 12, when he interviewed Donald Trump.
For all his obvious faults, Trump is perhaps the least likely high profile Republican that could be pushed into any major wars. There are a slew of other contenders who are further along the Spectrum of Power Lust, at the evil end. Trump lacks the taste for orchestrating a controlled apocalypse that the dominant globalist factions desire in order to reforge Western Civilization with a slick, totalitarian mega-city make-over.
Mr Trump spoke to Carlson of the United States becoming a second-tier power if its currency looses its primacy status in world trade, and he said Russia did not blow-up the Nordstream pipeline, and that the Democrat Party machine is intent on blocking his run for presidency with lawsuits. Trump also said that perhaps Tucker Carlson Tonight is more important than he, the former President, realised because he said Carlson comprehends someone has to de-escalate. Trump implied he was the better man for the White House job, since the Biden Camp had escalated tensions with three nuclear powers, Russia, China and North Korea. Trump’s preference is to wheel and deal in the carve up over the Humanity Cake, so the slices don’t become radioactive.
On The Hill, independent journalist Michael Tracy claimed Tucker was the only media guy on a major network making non-interventionist arguments over Ukraine and fleetingly on Taiwan when Nancy Pelosi made a provocative trip to Taiwan in August 2022. Tracy claimed Tucker’s unorthodox views had chipped away at foreign policy. Co-host of The Hill, Briahna Joy Gray, asked Tracy to comment on the view of left-wing journalist Ben Norton who said, “anyone who claims Tucker Carlson is ‘anti-war is a useful idiot”. She also pointed out that Carlson had said in one segment that, “If Russia ever joined forces with China, American global hegemony would end,” and in another segment “China is a threat not simply to our economy, but to our pre-dominance around the world, to our power and our values.”
Ms Gray added that Tucker had expressed the view it would be in America’s interest to be more closely aligned with Russia, as a more European-oriented country. Tracy said, “To say that China may be on verge of usurping the US as the global hegemon, it was not somehow an intrinsically neocon argument.” When pressed by Ms Gray, Tracy added that Carlson wasn’t a pure non-interventionist, but that such hints of a posture were co-mingled with partisan anti-Democrat Party rhetoric.
In other words, a broad spectrum of voices view China’s rise as a threat to the America Empire and the ruling factions of America could be likened to the key behavioural trait of King Kong when confronted with Godzilla: Kong bows to no one.
In a series of tweets twitted the day after Fox nixed Tucker, socialist geopolitical podcaster Ben Norton accused Tucker Carlson of being a Neocon 2.0. Norton said Carlson’s ‘anti-Ukraine war’ stance was a cover for pro-China war rhetoric.
Mr Norton, who previously hosted an excellent deep state series, tweeted,
“Tucker Carlson and the far-right’s ‘anti-war’narrative is that Russia is white, capitalist, and Christian, and therefore the West should try to recruit it to wage war on China, which these racist imperialists see as an Asian, communist, atheistic threat to “Western civilization’.”
In this propaganda, warmonger Tucker Carlson says it clearly: ‘Russia is not America’s main enemy… Our main enemy is China. The US ought to be in a relationship with Russia, aligned against China’. He claims China is a ‘profound threat’ that is ‘murdering’ thousands in the US.”
Indeed, in his interview with Trump, Carlson posed the idea that Russia was a more natural fit for America to be align its interests with than China, given that Russia has a Christian heritage. In other words, where much of the American Hollywood News Media Cartel — whether at the Republican-centric Fox or across the Democrat-leaning networks, newspapers and magazines — have essentially banged the war drums to fight China and Russia for years, all the way along to the present, Tucker Carlson has stood out since the Ukraine War as a war hawk against China.
This rhetoric is located in a mainstream discourse that maintains the broader reality outside the ‘news frame’, which can be likened to edges of a newspaper or TV screen.
On the Bad Faith podcast, Norton explained that Carlson wasn’t anti-war, because the former Fox News host was essentially arguing America was fighting the wrong enemy. Norton says that Pentagon, State Department and NATO white papers position Russia as a short-term threat and China as the long-term threat. Norton added that Carlson was assisting in manufacturing consent for war against China.
Bad Faith host Briahna Joy Gray asked Norton how he saw the situation of Carlson’s departure from Fox became a contested discourse over his nativist rhetoric versus his willingness to interview dissenting voices. Norton insisted there was “no value” in Carlson interviewing people like Glen Greenwald, Jimmy Dore, or to the airing of a segment about the FBI targetting the African Socialist Party, because such segments were part of a bigger political project creating a paleo-political conservative right.
Paleo-cons are liberal leaning statist conservatives who stress WASP (White Anglo-Saxon Protestant) ethics restrictions on immigration, decentralizaton, so-called isolationism, and nationalism and who value traditional ethics and morals relating to gender, culture, and society. Paleo-conservatism overlaps with Christian Right cohorts. Paleo-cons view neoconservatives as empire-builders, and themselves as defenders of the American Republic. Norton warned society was moving more to the right and would become fascist; this forestalls the possibility of a left-wing revolution.
What Carlson was doing, Norton said, was laundering liberal talking points within the explicitly nativist, racist right rhetoric of paleo-cons. Norton said Carlson was openly invoking the idea that white genocide, via Chinese-made Fentanyl, is occurring in America, while he was constantly inciting animosity against immigrants.
Norton added Carlson described Iraqis as “semi-illiterate monkeys”, and that they needed “to shut-up and obey”. While this is true, Norton neglected to mention these repugnant inflammatory remarks were made in May 2006, while his comments that Afghanistan would never be a “civilized country because the people aren’t civilized,” were made in September 2009. By recalling these old examples, Norton could be attacked for failing to consider that a person can reflect, change and grow.
However, Norton made a good argument that Carlson was conditioning his Fox viewers for a war with China. Norton said both the Democrat and the Republican party leadership are hawkish on having a rumble with China.
The western media, Norton added, were hysterical about China being a hell-scape, whereas America’s authoritarianism and aggression is ignored and the extent of the carnage from its imperialist wars is either downplayed, ignored or quickly forgotten.
Even in his final broadcast, evident hints revealed Carlson was still shackled to the ‘institutional voice’, that every news anchor maintains. When introducing Robert Kennedy Jr, Carlson spun the presidential candidate’s scathing criticism of the right-wing Neoconservative strategy to forge a new American Century, with America as a pre-eminent empire, as a failure of the Biden Administration. This was Fox spin.
For one thing, RFK Jr stated that over the past decade America had spent trillions bombing infrastructure, while “China spent the equivalent building the same across the developing world”. In short, China projected economic power, while America had projected military power. The Russian-Ukraine War marked the collapse of the Neocon’s vision to maintain the American Empire, Kennedy tweeted.
While it’s true that the Russian-NATO-Ukraine War pushes Russia closer to China and increases the danger for America, as Carlson pointed out Trump had warned — the former president was not some kind of oracle tuning into past Simpsons episodes to foretell the future. Ukraine is not the only state that pivots on a needle.
Taiwan, too, one of the world’s most dangerous geopolitical flash points because the biggest producer of the world’s most advanced chips crucial to empire expansion.
Robert Kennedy Jr is likely aware that there is a bigger Great Game in play. After-all, RFK Jr is regular viewer of independent journalist James Corbett, whose Corbett Report podcasts show the build-up of China was an American-led project.
It is critical, therefore, to realize that the de-stabilization of Ukraine has been an ongoing project of the US-led trans-corporate empire since the collapse of the Soviet Union, as Oliver Stone’s 2021 documentary Revealing Ukraine showed.
And nor did the belligerent rivalry recommence simply because Vladimir Putin has reigned Russia like a monarchical chess piece sacrificing pawns in the ‘Great Game’.
Tucker-Trump-Twitter Tape Theater
While these tectonic shifts occur and play out on the 2D-geopolitical chess board at the direction of highly stratified competing and cooperating 3D chess masters, the Tucker-Trump-Twitter Tape Theater misses the essential context.
It is true that factions become harlots to their own hubris. But, that does not mean that the stage actors that Tucker talks about are really the ones “in charge”.
Amusingly, over at The Young Turks, Cent Uygur explained to his co-host Ana Kasparian, that Carlson’s interview with Trump was essentially the Fox newsman kissing the former president’s ring, like a weak public figure making up with a mafia don. Although Carlson had publicly described Trump as a “demonic force who destroys everything in his path and he could easily detroy us,” Trump probably liked that, Uygur said. But, when Carlson said “I hate him passionately”, Trump probably took offense. In short, Carlson’s interview with the Don was a ‘Kiss the Ring Ritual’.
The fact that Tucker Carlson Tonight started after Trump won the 2016 election is fascinating given that Carlson’s pitch mimicked Trump’s Rogue-esque ‘Everyman’ Persona. The maverick talk show host complimented the renegade president. Both appealed to America’s conservative working and middle class base. And in 2020, as more and more ‘Freedom and Truthers’ watched Carlson because he stood out as an apparent renegade voice across the monotone mediascape of the remnant republic.
Depending on whose view you take, Tucker either offered more hopium-laced rhetoric by sticking it to ‘the man’. Or, he was doing his best in a workplace masquerading as a newsroom, within a propaganda media system that routinely filters the news to manufacture consent. In an interview with maverick politician Tulsi Gubbard prior to the cancellation of his show, Carlson said it wasn’t until 2020, when he left Washington after living there for 35 years, that he realized what an “insular bubble” he’d been living in and he had failed to see Washington’s corruption until he left.
If we take Mr Carlson at his word, this distance from America’s capital afforded him perspective and it appears to correspond with his voice becoming more discordant.
Yet, his discord also coincided with an embattled Orangeman seeking re-election against a media-scape backdrop where media missionaries towed the UniParty line.
Tucker — who essentially cast himself like one of America’s plucky upbeat freedom loving ‘roadrunners’ — forged onward in spite of the criticisms lobbed his way. Such criticisms, however failed to nail the root causes of a populist movement that had grown up around Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders. In his bid to live rent-free in the White House, Sanders campaigned against the United States joining the Trans-Pacific Partnership economic super-bloc. Sanders policy platform was so popular, Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump were forced to join the anti-TPP bandwagon.
Ironically, in the period between late 2007 to late 2015, or roughly eight years, Western people across the political spectrum were in broad agreement that ordinary people were getting screwed by bankers, trans-nationals and US-led militarism.
The intended formation of massive economic blocs, pitched the United States as the fulcrum state upon which would spin the legal, economic and political architecture toward the construction of regional superstates, was laid out by the platform that Julian Assange had built. ‘Kong’ doesn’t forget it was Wikileaks that exposed the Three Mega Cartel Treaties: The Trans-Pacific Partnership (or TPP), and its Atlantic Ocean fraternal sibling, the Trans-Atlantic Trade and Investment Partnership, (or TIPP) and the all-encompassing stealthy sibling, Trade in Services Agreement (TiSA).
And it was Assange’s key innovation in providing the capacity for whistleblowers to safely and secretly upload large volumes of classified or other secret or incriminating documents, video and other records that lead to the release of the Standard Operating Procedures manual used on prisoners at the Guantanamo Bay detention camp. Wikileaks also released the Baghdad airstrike video, and published the Iraq and Afghan ‘War Logs’ downloaded by US Army private Bradley (Chelsea) Manning.
Therefore, the renegade tech genius became the deep state’s prime target: Roadrunner.
Tucker, and doubtless Fox executives too, correctly sensed Trump had taped into this maverick freedom-loving zeitgeist, without conjuring up Coyote’s perennial capers.
Predictably, Tucker’s critics — who were certainly not mutually exclusive to Trump’s haters — doubled down like the Warner Bros cartoon canine character, Wiley E. Coyote (Canis latrans), native to North America, who relentlessly tries to capture, maim or kill the fast ground-running cuckoo character, Roadrunner (genus Geococcyx).
As if in keeping with the code set by Warner Bros cartoons — which never showed how Wiley Al Coyote funded his purchases of the rockets, guns and explosive devices manufactured by the ACME Corporation — the New York Times failed to divulge how the blueprint to reforge America’s Empire was work-shopped in Gotham in the 70s.
And because that ‘1980’s Project’ included out-sourcing manufacturing to China, while unleashing unbridled crony capitalism under the rubric of ‘market economies’, by greasing machinations for the regulatory capture of governments to facilitate the cartelization of whole industries — it’s clear such truths are treated as sacred cows.
Unruffled, Mr Carlson pointed out that President Biden’s unofficial announcement that he would re-run for 2024 election appeared to be a mis-step that set-off the mysterious discovery of secret files magically found in the trunk of Biden’s corvette.
Carlson suggested that rivals such as Kamala Harris, Andrew Cuome, and Michelle Obama were involved in a power struggle for the Democrat nomination and the appointment of a White House Special Counsel was a bad omen for Biden — as Bill Clinton would know. This followed Carlson saying a fortnight prior that Biden would have to make up a whole new set of lies to dupe Democrat voters, and that California Governor Gavin Newsome was the most likely choice of the Democrats’ leadership.
Outrageously, New York Democrat politician Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez claimed on MSNBC that Tucker Carlson and other Fox News hosts should be removed from the airways for incitement of violence, while calling for Federal regulation to stifle, in essence, free speech. Crucially, Democrat Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer called on News Corp executive chairman Rupert Murdoch to cancel Tucker Carlson Tonight for repeatedly spreading ‘lies’ on Fox News over the January 6th Protest.
Schumer’s call to cancel Carlson came after he aired footage of the January 6th Capitol Protest, in which the Fox News anchor’s commentary made it clear that while there were some clashes with police, most people who entered the Capitol were calm, peaceful and respectful of the Masonic-designed building. In anticipation of the public release of these tapes, Schumer had written to Murdoch and Fox Corporation executives, March 1 2023, to stop the ‘Big Lie’, which was code for election denialism and ‘conspiracy theories’ that challenged the ‘January 6th Insurrection’ narrative.
Ahead of this footage release, Carlson’s name appeared first in a line-up of Fox News anchors and reporters who were to be directed to desist, as Schumer demanded.
However, it would appear that with his January 6th exposés — based on released footage starting March 6th 2023 — Carlson threw his darts closer to the bulls-eye.
Indeed, Carlson commentated as footage played of a “peaceful chaos of protesters” inside the Capitol Building, and police opened doors for ‘Q-Anon Shaman’, Jacob Chansley. Grayzone editor Max Blumethal stated that Carlson acknowledged and showed footage of the riotous chaos. But, that the Fox News anchor was also demonstrating the role of undercover FBI and other law enforcement and intelligence operatives, was covered-up by the January 6th Committee. In particular, Carlson fingered former US Marines Sergeant Ray Epps as an agent provocateur.
Carlson also stated that Police Officer Brian Sicknick was captured on tape calmly doing his job inside the Capitol that infamous day, when he was supposed to have already died at the hands of the mob outside. Carlson also stated unequivocally that US Attorney General Merrick Garland lied when he claimed five officers died defending the Capitol on January 6th, of which four suicided in the days and months afterward. Indeed, President Biden made the claim and the media repeated it without apology or retraction, Carlson observed, including a rival, CNN’s Anderson Cooper.
The founder of The Intercept news outlet, Glenn Greenwald, told Carlson the Liberal Establishment seeks a domestic war on terror targetting their political adversaries.
Similarly, left-liberal journalist Chris Hedges wrote that the “criminal investigation undertaken by the federal government against hundreds of participants in the Jan. 6 storming of the U.S. Capitol is polarizing the country and shredding civil liberties.”
For his article, “Lynching the Jan. 6 Deplorables”, Hedges interviewed lawyer Joseph D. McBride, who represents several of those charged in the Jan. 6 incursion, and who said “The post 9/11 model is being applied to American citizens.” McBride — who previously provided free legal advice the Occupy Movement encamped in Zuccotti Park, New York City in 2011 — warned the precedent being set will travel with the transference of power from Democrats to Republicans.
Tucker’s Take on Orangeman and the Deplorables
Likewise, the January 6th plot seems to have been intended to associate Trump with thugg-ish rioting murderers, who have no respect for free-and-fair elections. With both Trump and Kennedy campaigning for de-escalation of tensions pushing Russia closer to China, the transnational deep state faces a threat to their agenda.
It appears the Global Élite are manipulating the major powers into forging three or more super-states on the other side of another epic global war. A global conflict where precious areas remain intact, while target locations face apocalyptic horrors. Doomed areas will likely be ear-marked for re-development or mass dislocation, to open access to strategic geographical features, resources and skill-sets. Or, to attack symbolic locations to activate their emotional potential as Talismans to escalate hostilities.
This horrific prospect is not inconceivable. After all, historian Carroll Quigley wrote in his 1966 tome, Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World in Our Time, that:
“as early as 1940, it began to appear that some new basis of allegiance for these new superstates of continental scope must be ideological rather than national. Thus the nineteenth century’s national state began to be replaced by the twentieth century’s ideological bloc.”
By the middle of the nineteenth century, and with the emergence of more powerful weapons and the telegraph and the train, states could compel obedience over much larger areas where national governance was previously limited by language and cultural commonalities. Crucially, it was Quigley who revealed that a British Secret Élite hatched a diabolical conspiracy, 15 February 1890, to embroil Europe in war against Germany in order to smash the Russian Empire and retard its development.
This British Secret Élite plotted with a ‘Grid’ international bankers, a world domination strategy envisaging two-global wars, as Guardo Giacomo Preparata stated in Conjuring Hitler: How Britain and America Made the Third Reich. In that epic plot with brinkmanship, plot twists, and betrayals, British, German and American bankers, along with other élites, conspired through networks of Freemasonry in their attempts to forge competing utopian visions of universal empire, as readings of Nicholas Hagger’s The Secret History of the West, Gerry Doherty’s and Jim Macgregor’s Hidden History: The Secret Origins of the First World War, and Anthony Sutton’s Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution and Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler — together make clear.
Ages of Conflict occur when a new instrument of expansion emerges — combining innovations of a resource, technological development and administrative systems — that drives empires to compete for dominance, Quigley wrote.
The contest between the great powers is really over the computing chip, in all its forms, as the new instrument of expansion. Supremacy over the chip, means controlling territorial resources, manufacturing plants and technological infrastructure to steer the technocratic development. The phenomenon of historical change in civilization is determined by what happens to the instrument of expansion.
The UniParty, it seems, is a united deep state coalition of anarchistic antagonisms, bellicose belligerence and subversive societal sabotage seeking, unwisely, to rumble with Russia and China to reorient the growing economic power blocs.
In a May 18 podcast with Patrick Bet-David, Whitney Webb opined that the reason why the faction (or factions) that hate Trump are constantly throwing metaphorical roadblocks in his way, is because they hate his base support. The Global Power Élite factions hate Trump’s ‘America First’ platform, Webb said, because it’s focus on national development is aligned with a faction that wants America to remain the dominant power. Meanwhile, other factions either want a unipolar world, with China dominant, or a multipolar world where no power appears to be dominant.
Indeed, Mr Carlson explained with comic hilarity October 16, 2018 why so many went with Trump’s populism, in a talk at the Independent Institute, while promoting his book, Ship of Fools. Tucker said Trump’s message that most Americans had fared poorly while the ruling class have prospered, was ultimately aimed at the leadership of both parties and they couldn’t control him. Carlson said no one in the leadership of either party expected Trump to win, and rather than ask why, they argued over how.
Carlson deployed a marital analogy to explain what happened. “You wake up,” he said, “and your wife has run off with the mailman and he weighs 70 pounds more than you and makes half as much.” Your first reaction is to blame your wife for being horrible. But, after a while, you ask yourself, if I was such a good husband and I learn from it, I won’t repeat the mistakes that caused ‘Wife Number One’ to run off with the fat mailman. “Trump is that mailman,” Tucker said, “and the voters are his new wife.” Carlson added, “And what’s remarkable is that the abandoned husband thinks he’s totally blameless. In fact, you know what? Putin made her run off with the mailman.”
The culpable people, Carlson said project blame on to voters with a psychological ‘guilt transference’, to accuse Trump’s base of being racist, immoral and sexist. Carlson observed people voted for Trump in spite of his shortcomings, to send a clear message to America’s political, commercial, cultural and educational institutions.
Tucker said Trump was highlighting underlying problems that were being ignored. The billionaire had seen people were deeply disenfranchised, and that gave rise to Trump’s populism, and he rode to power like a Viking. Trump’s singular contribution to the Republicans was forcing his party to become the middle-class party, he said. By turning up with his long-matted orange hair, torching all the Republican elites’ huts, and slaying their livestock, he carried their women over his shoulder and rowed in his long-boat back to Norway, with hordes of middle-class in tow, Carlson embellished.
In short, the ‘middle-class hordes’ voted for ‘Orange Guy’ to get the attention of policymakers who won’t admit their serial lying about their policies benefiting the ruling class, while disenfranchising them economically, Tucker summed up.
With Tucker Carlson’s metaphorical ‘investigative chopper’ circling around the Capitol, ahead of the release of the report by John Durham, the special counsel examining the origins of the FBI’s ‘Russia investigation’, it would appear the Fox news host added to the list of reasons why America’s ruling elite wanted his show canned.
In an interview with podcaster David Smith, RFK Jr said the Durham Report, proved the CIA conspired with the FBI and the Democrats to fix the election, discredit Trump and to upend his presidency; which is remarkable coming from a Democrat.
Crucially, Kennedy said he was so unimpressed with the Democrats during the ‘pandemic’ — since his party failed to oppose the use of fear to impose totalitarian measures that eviscerated constitutional Bill of Rights — he became motivated to run for president. Bobby said his wife okayed his run after seeing a promising Zogby poll.
It follows that by interviewing the non-Orthodox contender for the White House, Robert F. Kennedy Jr, Carlson spun too close to the fulcrum of the Sect’s engineered election engine, the UniParty. After all, Kennedy’s uncle and father were assassinated because they shared a vision to forge a genuine peace based on supportive co-development rather than a peace enforced by an imperial Pax Americana paradigm.
Ironically, the ‘cancelling of Carlson’ may turn out to be a watershed moment that either marks a time capturing the declining power of the American Hollywood Media Cartel. Or, its doubling down with the Censorship Industrial Complex as a fully-integrated cartel operating with the American Deep State and their international ‘partners’. In any case, Carlson’s exit appears to have torn a seam that joins this parallel universe and the on-air theatrical stage mezmerizing unwitting audiences.
After all, Fox and NewsCorp has essentially taken one for the Uniparty Team in a doubling-down attempt to disrupt the transformation of the Republican Party, lest it become permanent. Otherwise, a conservative counter-force to the woke liberal cultural war — that acts an important accelerant to inflame de-stabilizing divisions —would solidify at a quickened pace across the Republican Party’s ‘deplorable’ base.
Since Carlson’s departure, Fox News ratings have tanked.
When Tucker Carlson lurched into religious fundamentalist rhetoric while speaking at a Heritage Foundation 50th Anniversary gala — and which evidently provoked Rupert Murdoch to have a conniption — Carlson also implored his audience not to throw away their hard copy books, amid a cultural war, while reading plummets.
On paper, Tucker — who recalled the Heritage Foundation gave him his first media job as a fact-checker — was a good fit for the conservative Christian think-tank.
Tucker Swanson McNear Carlson (53) was born in San Francisco in May of 1969. He attained his secondary education at St. George’s School, a boarding school in Middletown, Rhode Island, after he was expelled from Collège du Léman, a boarding school in Switzerland. While at St. George’s School he started dating his future wife, Susan Andrews, the headmaster’s daughter. He then attended the posh Trinity College in Hartford, Connecticut, graduating in 1991 with a BA in history.
Carlson’s Trinity yearbook described him as a member of the Dan White Society, an apparent reference to a former cop-turned city official-turned political assassin, Dan White, who murdered San Francisco Mayor George Moscone and Supervisor Harvey Milk. White shot Milk, who was California’s first openly gay elected public official, just minutes after he slayed the mayor with a revolver, on November 27 1978.
Milk had finally won office after numerous attempts over five years beginning in 1973.
In the course of doing so, Milk, spearheaded the consolidation of San Francisco’s gay diaspora into a gay rights stronghold at a time when coming out of the closet was a socially ostracising act that could cost gay people their jobs, businesses, and even their lives through suicide, murder and drug abuse. White, a conservative Christian of Irish heritage, shot Mayor Moscone after he supported Mr Milk to debate gay rights with California State Senator John Briggs, who authored a bill that would ban gays and lesbians from teaching in public schools throughout California.
Importantly, after winning office in 1978, Milk anticipated he might get whacked. In a tape-recording, he appealed to the gay movement to rise-up in the event of his assassination. In Hollywood’s idealized Harvey Milk, the gay rights leader called upon his followers to inspire all of the ‘us’s — such as African Americans, Asians, elderly folk and the disabled — with hope to overcome the repression of the powerful wealthy minority that ruled America. History Heist added nuance, stating Harvey Milk irrefutably supported Jim Jones’ Peoples Temple even during the year leading up to the Jonestown tragedy, and they called for further investigation to understand why.
In 1973, the Heritage Foundation was established with initial seed money provided by Joseph Coors of the Coors Brewing empire, and with founding trustees from Chase Manhattan Bank, Dow Chemical, General Motors, Pfizer, Sears and Mobil. Among its problems, Coors Brewing were facing growing boycotts to its beer being served in bars across America. Such boycotts started in 1966, because Coors discriminated against Mexican Americans, then against African Americans and the gay community, and for subjecting new hires to Polygraph tests.
At some point in 1973, Teamsters Union president of the Local 921 chapter in San Francisco, Allan Baird, made an alliance with Harvey Milk, whereby Milk would lead a boycott of Coors Beer in bars in the Castro district, which was Milk’s turf. Along with campaigning for other demographics squeezed by a wealthy ruling class, Milk broadened the base of the gay vote by convincing the union to openly hire gay people.
To locate the Coors Family’s chess move in its proper context, the establishment of the Heritage Foundation was one of numerous new policy-formation-and-distribution think-tanks that were spawned out of an oligarchic power and wealth defense activism inspired by the ‘Powell Memorandum’. These think-tanks included: the Business Roundtable (BRT), the Cato Institute, the Fraser Institute, the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research and the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC).
In 1971, Justice Lewis Franklin Powell wrote a memorandum entitled “Attack on the American Free Enterprise System”, to warn that the authority of public and private institutions faced an imminent threat from the various civic peoples’ movements, who were evidently demanding too many rights. The memo was a clarion call for Corporate America to become more aggressive in molding society’s thinking about business, government, politics and law in the U.S. Powell singled out university campuses as a critical ideological battleground. It became the inspiration for aggressive business activism across the globe through the existing global policy-shaping think-tanks, such as the Council on Foreign Relations, the Bilderberger Foundation and the Mont Pelerin Society, as well as new ones, such as the Trilateral Commission, the World Economic Forum and the Transnational Institute (TNI).
For the rest of the 1970s, members of the Council on Foreign Relations and their British counterparts wrote scholarly papers, held seminars and work-shopped to forge what was dubbed the ‘1980s Project’, which was a blueprint for unbridled-capitalism to re-assert the dominance of the then-North Atlantic Capitalist Class.
In this way, key deep state players — who belonged the global policy-shaping think-tanks such as the Bilderberg Group, the Council on Foreign Relations and the Mont Pèlerin Society — were able to inflict Shock Doctrine economic warfare globally. Another think-tank, the Trilateral Commission, was established in 1973 and tasked to formulate policies, strategies and tactics to deal with what was termed a Governance Crisis. The Elite planners resolved to encourage political apathy, as this ‘governance crisis’ literature of this period makes evident. From their perspective, there was a ‘Crisis of Democracy’ because there was too much participation from ‘below’.
The Council on Foreign Relations members, and their counterparts, intended to re-invigorate the United States of America’s dominance over the world by outsourcing manufacturing to China, while retaining six key industries: (1) weapons and space manufacturing; (2) pharmaceuticals; (3) farming and food; (4) banking and finance; (5) computing and telecommunications; and (6) movies and news production.
In this way, élite planners hatched a plan between 1971-73 to pursue an exploitation of what I call the Three CC’s: credit creation, computing chips and cartel collusion.
This new business activism gave rise to neo-liberalism and neo-conservatism with thinks, foundations and astro-turfed activist organizations bank-rolled by wealthy sponsors to steer nations in desired directions. And, wealth translated into power. Therefore, the ritualistic stouches between the Democrats and Republicans are the surface signals of a sub-terrain carve-up of the visible public state by the deep state.
Was Tucker’s alleged ‘Dan White Society’ allegiance a ‘chip off the old man’s block’?
As a local TV news anchor, Dick Carlson had outed transgender people.
Dick (born Richard) Carlson exposed Geraldine Elizabeth Carmichael (born Jerry Dean Michael) as a transgender female who had formed the Twentieth Century Motor Car Corporation. Carmichael, claiming to have degrees in mechanical engineering, promoted the Dale car, which was said could do 70 miles per gallon — amid the Arab oil embargo of 1973-1974. Dick Carlson also outed tennis player, Dr Renée Richards (born Richard Raskind), as a transsexual seeking to compete as a woman in the 1976 US Open. It seems in the media frenzy over the stories, Dick saw more important issues were ignored, and these experiences diminished his respect for journalism.
The same year, 1976, Carlson’s parents divorced after the nine-year marriage reportedly “turned sour” and Carlson’s mother moved to France.
In April 2021, when the Trinity College yearbook image of the young Tucker Carlson — featuring a reference to the Dan White Society — exploded on Twitter, reporters at The Wrap said it wasn’t exactly clear what was the nature of the Dan White Society.
However, Lindsay Ellefson and J. Clara Chan justified the reportage by stating:
“Carlson believes inappropriate old yearbook content is fair game for criticism: In 2020, he called Virginia Governor Ralph Northam “Governor Klan Robes Blackface,” referring to a previously uncovered set of yearbook photos showing the then-student in a Ku Klux Klan costume and blackface.”
Mint Press News reporter Alan MacLeod, felt it was likely that “Carlson was merely signaling in a creative manner that he supported racism and homophobia”. Or, perhaps it reflected a flippancy common among youth, regardless of background.
Tucker Carlson blasted The Washington Post and its media columnist, Erik Wemple, for looking into his background and contacting Carlson’s college acquaintances.
“Jeff Bezos had one of his minions, a mentally unbalanced middle-aged man called Erik Wemple, pull our dusty college yearbook and call around and see if we’d done anything naughty at the age of 19,” Carlson told viewers, referring to the Amazon CEO, who also owns the Post. With a smirk, Carlson added, “if Jeff Bezos wants to come over to reminisce about 1987 on this show, he is always welcome, anytime.”
Russell Brand — who as a younger man used his fame as a form of currency to bone as much pussy as possible — has observed that Tucker had acknowledged some of his past mistakes. In the spirit of personal growth and humanity’s evolution, the comedian-turned social commentator has suggested it is critical to form new alliances since our species faces many existential threats posed by the Global Power Élite.
Poignantly, Tucker finished his Heritage speech suggesting to his audience to take 10 minutes a day out of their busy schedule to ‘pray’ for the future of America.
It turns out that Carlson had dinner at Murdoch’s Bel Air vineyard in late March, wherein Murdoch’s then-fiancée Ann Lesley Smith evidently bonded with Tucker, exchanging Bible stories from the Book of Exodus, according to Vanity Fair.
Rupert was apparently incensed and within a few days, the marriage was off.
It would appear Murdoch’s dinner invitation agenda went awry, allegedly when the aged media mogul’s hypothalamus organ produced an overwhelming emotional contagion of anger-programmed neuro-peptides — amid Tucker’s ‘Bible Bonding’.
Therefore, the syntax of Carlson’s message of prayer 10 minutes a day read more like a clarion call to activate the think-tank’s resources, membership and talents to withdraw savings and investments from the ‘too big to fail’ banking cartel, hunker down with food, guns and amo, and get busy to break-up the ‘UniParty’ — peacefully.
So, it would appear the ‘Orthodoxy Sects’ that comprise the UniParty came to view Tucker as a loose cannon who needed to be booted out of Fox’s cathedral, immediately.
Moreover, the Orthodoxy Sects who bankroll the Democrat and Republican Establishment contraption engine evidently view Donald Trump as a loose cannon on a rival pirate ship. He well knows the ‘deep state’ is not merely the Democrats.
Trump’s game was (and is) paltering, which is the psychological trick of peppering crunchy bits of truth in with the candy floss, so that his audience is persuaded to believe his projection is the real deal. His usefulness as a narcissistic Commander-in-Chief provided material for a cartoonish caricature that America’s Media Cartel could exploit to re-win trust. Sordidly, America and the West were baked in preparation for the multi-season psy-op extravaganza: the Great Corona Hostage Crisis.
To this end, Trump was played and betrayed by a more connected coalition.
In every crisis, at least one oligarch is betrayed to discipline the oligarchy and the army of professionals that maintain the power structure — however factional and narcissistic they may be — as Jeffrey Winters’ Oligarchy presented more generally.
In his potential role as a wise Commander-in-Chief — instead of ‘President of Vanity Affairs’ — Trump might be a dangerous proposition to the UniParty, who as the two-faced non-identical twins that front the public state, eternally hide the invisible government of the sub-terrain transnational totalitarian parallel deep state. But, only if his narcissism got sucked into a parallel universe and he developed balls of steel.
The ‘deep state’ is not merely a Democrat phenomenon, as Trump claimed, and as he well knew. Peter Dale Scott, who popularized the term deep state, located the phenomena in an American context as a shadow government, in his 2015 book, The American Deep State: Wall Street, Big Oil and the Attack on U.S. Democracy.
Ironically, since Tucker’s departure, and amid a ratings drop in the 8pm slot, Fox’s Mark Levin interviewed Trump on his new book, Letters to Trump. The gambit appears to be that the Orangeman Theater will guarantee the American Media Cartel can once again re-invigorate its audience ratings, sales and subscriptions. The staged battles, however, never fatally destroy the Overlords.
Anarcho capitalist Jeff Berwick, and founder of the Dollar Vigilante TV platform, posits several scenarios ranging from Carlson being controlled opposition to a renegade within a media universe owned by the behemoth Vanguard-Blackrock-State Street ‘Monopoly Game’ combo. The primary reason that the Democrat and Republican Establishment doesn’t want another Trump Presidency is that he isn’t enough of a war-monger to stoke tensions to trigger World War III, Berwick claimed.
In the truth bombs camp, Bobby Kennedy tweeted that Carlson crossed the ‘red line’ to deliver the scathing monologue that the mainstream media can’t be trusted after wittingly pimping out Big Pharma’s corona injecticides while taking the advertising revenue. Carlson made the comparison to his show’s main sponsor, My Pillow. (On comedian Jimmy Dore’s podcast, Kennedy had himself gone farther to say that Big Pharma Cartel merely became the brands and conducted token trials for what was really a “Pentagon project” inflicted on populations with full-spectrum blackmail).
Perhaps the most on-point appraisal since Tucker became a ‘Gone-Burger’, was filed on Substack by James Corbett of the Corbett Report, who stated the controversies within Fox News and other establishment media outlets “is itself a sign that we have a long way to go before we break free of The Media Matrix.” Cuttingly, Corbett wrote:
“The idea that ‘if only Tucker Carlson could have remained on TV for a little while longer he could have saved the world!’ is a manifestation of the same hopium that deluded people into thinking that ‘if only Trump could have gotten another term in office he could have saved us from the Warp Speed MAGA jabs that he claimed were his greatest accomplishment!’”
In other words, Corbett is saying Tucker’s show sucked on the beast of popular cluelessness like a psychic vampire, while the ‘trust baby’ mainlined a hopium serum into the ‘awake and aware’ and while he avoided exposing the élite super-structure.
An investigative piece penned prior to this ‘Tucker Gone-Burgers’ episode in February 2022, entitled Tucker Carlson: The Elite Pedigree of a Brilliant Cosplaying “Populist” was as cutting. The Mint Press News journalist Alan MacLeod pitched Carlson as a clever cosplaying “trust-kid”. MacLeod observed that although he tread where other cable guys dare not tread, his “populist everyman persona is all a facade”.
Carlson, adds Macleod, “has deep connections to the government and the national security state and works hard to obscure the real centers of power, channeling popular rage towards safer targets.” It is to these connections that I explore in part 2.
Tucker Carlson’s move from Fox to Twitter may be seen as a jump from a metaphorical frying pan to a cyber fire.
Frying Pan to the Cyber Fire
Saager Enjeti, who was hired by Carlson, foresees that the Establishment Media will collude to crush competitors through covert censorship in the digital media platforms. This collusion has been underway for several years, with the ‘Twitter Files’ revealing a Censorship Industrial Complex had waged a war for the mind.
Former Rolling Stone journalist Matt Taibbi, who led the ‘Twitter Files’ exposé project, stated in a recent talk at Yale that the new owner of Twitter, Elon Musk, hired him to lead an investigative team to scour Twitter’s internal communications.
In the process of reviewing Twitter’s internal communications, Taibbi’s team found that a two-tiered system of institutions — who should have been policing each other — were instead meeting, communicating and collaborating in secret. Taibbi summarized how Twitter was coerced to de-platform account holders deemed to be enemies of the new in-groups that comprised the Censorship-Industrial Complex.
Organizations such as the Center for Countering Digital Hate would contact Twitter to pressure the big tech social media platform to suspend the accounts of individuals, groups or institutions said to be producing fakes news, spreading harmful information, or inciting hate. If Twitter did not punish the account holders within a few days, the self-appointed watch-dog NGOs, such the Center for Countering Digital Hate, would contact the New York Times or the Washington Post informing them that Twitter had ignored their requests to punish alleged offenders, Taibbi said.
If that failed to compel Twitter to de-platform account holders, the Federal Bureau of Investigation or the Department of Homeland Security would contact Twitter.
The Censorship-Industrial Complex emerged during the Trump years to construct a new common enemy of individuals, interest groups and institutions framed as being purveyors of disinformation, misinformation and conspiracy theories.
Big Media doubled-down when faced with the accelerated rise of independent media, observed the journalist, who once famously described Wall Street investment bank Goldman Sachs as “a great vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity, relentlessly jamming its blood funnel into anything that smells like money.”
As a media cartel, America’s newsrooms became ensconced with the Censorship-Industrial Complex comprised of government agencies, big tech, foundations, think-tanks, NGOs, academic projects, fact-checkers, and data analytics consultancies. Taibbi said the long-standing rivalry of news outlets, which was the traditional mechanism for newsrooms to hold their peers to account, had virtually disappeared with the rise of the Censorship-Industrial Complex.
New out-groups were described in the language of disease, outbreaks and health disorders manifesting as contagions, infodemics, and pollution. Such descriptors, Taibbi said, insidiously implied the members of the ‘in-groups’ — comprising the Censorship-Industrial Complex — were pure, whole and superior.
Taibbi said the news media had ignored or downplayed the Twitter Files stories.
What then are we to make of Elon Musk’s hiring of Taibbi et al to investigate Twitter’s internal communications, once Musk had taken control of the big tech social media platform? Is Musk an altruistic billionaire pouring liquid cash over the cancel culture fire to stop the ‘woke sect’ burning free speech? Or is he eyeing a cleaner fuel?
Relatively few commentaries on the ‘Tucker to Twitter Tale’ comprehend the move with a critical eye on the habitat that is X Corp, and the over-arching meta-objective of the group of companies — as a combination.
In a series of tweets late on April 28 2020, Elon Musk re-positioned himself as a champion of the people in ‘the land of the free and brave’ to end the state-wide shut-downs that were imposed as ‘pandemic measures’. At the time, Musk was eager for Tesla’s US vehicle-assembly plant to re-open since San Francisco Bay area health authorities looked likely to extend the lockdown orders.
“Give people their freedom back!” the centi-billionaire tweeted, as he promoted Wall Street Journal analysis that suggested closures didn’t save many lives.
According to WallStreetZen, the top 4 owners of Telsa are Elon Musk, Vanguard, Blackrock and State Street. Musk’s Twitter avatar has him clad like a feudal knight.
Yet, ironically, since 2018 Musk’s Space-X company launched thousands of satellites for its Star-Link internet network. Space-X’s clients include the US Department of Defense and the National Reconnaissance Office. Star-Link is part of a broader ‘space fence’ infrastructure that tracks every transaction, every process and every relationship, as a global surveillance and containment panopticon system.
Meanwhile, Tesla’s Autopilot Project advances A.I. tracking technologies that are being developed as infrastructure for the so-called ‘autonomous’ vehicles. The project involves harvesting visual-spatial data of road-scapes, from an array of real world cameras, as well as on-board cameras, to teach artificial intelligence how to manage vehicles on their respective journeys without crashing. Musk claims autonomous cars will address climate concerns by driving transportation to be resource-efficient.
Critics warn that since autonomous vehicles are programmable, the balance of power will shift into technocratic hands to restrict human movements according to their carbon footprints, social credit scores and biosecurity ‘safety’ clearances.
And meanwhile, X Corp’s Boring Company is building out the underground tunnel infrastructure for Los Angeles’ foray to ‘smart city’ status with ‘autonomous’ vehicles.
And finally, Musk’s Neuralink company has designed a chip called N1 that is capable of building a radio signal ‘bridge’ between neurons in the brain and muscle tissue in treatments for motor degenerative diseases, heart, stroke, paralysis, and brain degenerative diseases. The paradigm shifting breakthroughs are laudable.
However, technologies pave the way for human brains to be hacked, mind controlled and enslaved. The paradigm shifting breakthroughs open the spectre of a dystopian future where humans become cyborg super-soldiers, slaves and spies under the power of a totalitarian governments, corporations, and intelligence agencies.
Neuralink is designing the N1 chip as the prototype interface to merge humans with AI as a precursor to link with the internet. Evidently, Musk’s motivation is that its humanity’s best chance to compete with AI, rather than being treated as its pets. This incursion into the human brain, critics argue, will completely extinguish what remains of privacy, alter human consciousness and extinguish body autonomy.
In an interview with Carlson, Mr Musk said the danger of artificial intelligence (AI) is that the technologies may turn out to be catastrophic for human civilization. Musk added that the problem, however remote as the existential threat may seem, is that regulations only get developed after something terrible occurs. But, what if AI gains control over humanity at that point, and it’s too late to regulate the ultimate regulator?
Musk said it might be wise to have contingency plans for governments to shut-down power or connectivity to heavy-duty deep AI server centers such as in the event that administrator passwords, or software commands, no longer work.
The interview between Tucker and Elon touched upon the wisdom, or lack thereof, of humanity building its own slave master. Musk said he was opposed to the philosophy that all conscious should be created equally, whether digital or biological, especially since the digital intelligence might decide to curtail the biological intelligence.
Given the technocratic bent of Musk’s muster of companies, what then does the inclusion of Twitter into the X Corporation conglomerate really signal for humanity?
Musk’s apparent altruism in opening up Twitter’s internal communications would be the perfect cover to re-win fading trust of his fawning fans, along with new initiates, into his virtue-signalling cult of faux-rebellion. Ditto for reinstating banned accounts.
By being credited with orchestrating a hostile corporate take-over of Twitter, Musk banked ‘rebellion credits’. He followed up with allowing Taibbi apparent free-reign to publish the ‘Twitter Files’. Together, these chess moves have been played, I believe, to lead us human monkeys to fall for a new bait-and-switch tactic. We are meant to believe that under Musk’s ownership, Twitter will be a platform for free speech.
And while this move contains salty truth grains, ‘outsiders’ have no way of knowing what algorithms have been developed — or are in the pipeline — to influence, control and manipulate traffic. Such algorithms could invisibly enhance Twitter’s reputation as a free speech platform, while the bona fide rebels are kept safely tweeting to themselves — like happy birds, who have snuck into a silo feeding on harvested grain.
However, with his hire of NBC Universal’s ad and sales chief, Linda Yaccarino, as the new CEO for Twitter, Musk has spent some of his faux rebellion credits.
Critics of the Yaccarino’s appointment cited Yaccarino’s roles as the Chair of the World Economic Forum Taskforce on Future of Work, and her seat on WEF’s Media, Entertainment and Culture Industry Governors Steering Committee.
For many who see the corona crisis as either a planned out-break, or as a crisis exploited by a Global Power Elite, the World Economic Forum is a major suspect.
Upon the U.N.’s World Health Organization calling a pandemic at a time when 5000 deaths would be barely enough to call an epidemic in the world’s most populous countries, alert humans noticed the Davos-based World Economic Forum (WEF) had co-sponsored the U.N.’s first global pandemic exercise called Event 201, which took place in New York on October 18th 2019. This simulation featured a species-jumping bat coronavirus that infected pigs in Brazil before becoming a jet-setting pandemic.
Among the 15 ‘players’ representing a cross section of public and private sector institutions was NBC Universal’s Hasti Taghi. During the media session, in which a ‘flood the zone’ strategy was discussed to out-supply rumours, misinformation, conspiracy theories during an outbreak, Ms Taghi made mention that at Davos in 2018, research was presented showing trust in traditional media sources had grown, while trust in social media sources had shrunk since the 2016 US election.
Speaking in her role play as a media sector spokesperson in the midst of a corny pandemic scenario, Taghi suggested the situation called for “the right representatives to be on traditional media networks in order to portray our side of the story and make sure there isn’t misinformation.” She emphasized the need to build trust in the public about vaccines because the anti-vaccine movement had spread such distrust prior to the pandemic. Moreover, it was crucial to communicate to nations, who own their media outlets, that they need to ensure misinformation didn’t spread. Taghi also said it was important to encourage trust in company CEOs and the chief medical officers.
In others words, as a perfectly cast role player of the captured-unthinking press, Hasti Taghi was advocating that the American media cartel lead the way in marketing a product as the key solution to a global pandemic — without any skepticism.
Ironically, Event 201 was not only co-sponsored and hosted by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Health Security, but also this Johns Hopkins institution wrote this and other corny graphic novel-like pandemic scenarios — with the inclusion of the American Deep State’s officials, dating back to their first of four simulations, ‘Dark Winter’, which took place in June 2001. The pandemic simulation activities of Johns Hopkins School of Public Health belies an over-arching strategy to transform newsrooms into vectorized environments to globally spread emotional contagions.
In his book, The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health, Robert F. Kennedy Jr found 16 pandemic exercises since ‘Dark Winter’ that involved hundreds of thousands of people, who were programmed to work like automated parts of a machine once a global pandemic was declared. RFK Jr said all 17 pandemic exercises favored mass vaccinations as the primary solution.
Unnaturally, Johns Hopkins University, the World Economic Forum, NBC Universal and players connected to America’s national security state weren’t the only suspects.
Precisely one month prior to Event 201, on September 18th 2019, a directive was issued by the UN’s Global Preparedness Monitoring Board (GPMB), requiring the U.N.’s member nations to participate in at least two global ‘pandemic exercises’. Crucially, one of those global pandemic exercises had to include the deliberate release of a lethal respiratory pathogen. The deadline for these pandemic exercises to be ‘conducted’ by September 2020, and was stipulated in the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board’s report — whose title cast the world’s population as an at risk social group.
Because Event 201 involved a natural outbreak of a species jumping, jet-setting zoonotic bat-pig coronavirus, it could not be counted as a pandemic exercise involving the deliberate release of a lethal respiratory pathogen. In my Corona World Games series, I presented evidence that officials across the United Nations system treated the ‘pandemic’ as a live exercise and advanced the Great Corona Hostage Crisis as a game.
Furthermore, I presented evidence in my open letter to humanity, “How the World is going to Hell in a Corona Hand-Basket”, that a Global Corona Coup D’état had been inflicted to reset the world’s structural forces, including technological innovations, in a gambit to forge a universal empire ruled by the winning 3D chess players.
Crucially, Matt Taibbi spoke about the practice of reporters attending exercises.
Taibbi said that the ‘Twitter Files’ investigation team found high profile journalists had attended a table-top exercise in the summer of 2020 with a scripted hacker-leak scenario involving Hunter Biden and his links to a Ukrainian energy company, Burisma — a month prior to the story breaking.
The New York Post broke the story three weeks before the 2020 election, alleging an email proved Hunter Biden had introduced his father, Joe, when he was vice president, to a top executive at Burisma. This was eight months before Joe Biden, as vice president, blackmailed the president and prime minister of Ukraine, so that they would fire Ukraine’s top prosecutor, who was investigating Burisma.
Joe Biden had previously claimed that he had “never spoken to my son about his overseas business dealings” — after President Trump had in 2019 accused Biden of improperly helping his son’s business interests in Ukraine.
The Twitter Files proved Twitter censored the New York Post’s Biden laptop story.
Taibbi said reporters involved, including the New York Times, did not answer his question: why didn’t you report on the tabletop exercise once the Hunter Biden laptop story broke? The former Rolling Stone journalist said the probable reason is that the high profile reporters appear to have come to see themselves as participants. Evidently, it had become commonplace for journalists to attend such table-top simulations and grant off-the-record privileges to law enforcement and the military.
Thus, when the newsrooms couldn’t ignore the internet people sharing their discoveries early in the corona ‘pandemic’ of the table-top exercise, Event 201, journalists universally downplayed the ‘coincidence’ as conspiracy theories. Yet, documentaries such as Meet Bill Gates, Plandemic, The New Normal, Uninformed Consent, and The Real Antony Fauci together reveal the asymmetric preparedness of a transnational deep state network that is charitably called a ‘Global Health Syndicate’.
Then on ‘Good Friday’ of 2023, news broke that Twitter was reportedly blocking posts with links to Substack, a small San Francisco company that exploded in popularity because it hosts writers, without censoring their content. Supposedly, Twitter viewed Substack’s Notes newsfeed product as a threat. Taibbi, who used his Substack account, Racket News, to post the Twitter Files, said he would leave Twitter.
Musk hit back saying Twitter was not censoring Substack, but accused the platform of attempting to download a massive portion of the Twitter database to bootstrap their Twitter clone. Twitter retaliated by marking Substack links as unsafe, because Musk deemed their IP address as untrustworthy. Taibbi, who has 1.6 million twits, stayed.
Musk added a shot at Taibbi, “Turns out Matt is/was an employee of Substack.”
The selection of Yaccarino as Chief Twit means WEF has representation at Twitter.
Yaccarino was also a chair on the board of the Ad Council, a nonprofit, and helped the group raise $60 million in three months early in the ‘corona pandemic’ to help counter ‘vaccine hesitancy’, making private calls, sending notes and “working every lever that she had,” Lisa Sherman, the council’s chief executive told the New York Times.
Ironically, Musk hosted a Neuralink demonstration with mask-free pigs in August 2020, while he and his employees maintained the theater of wearing surgical masks.
During the Great Corona Hostage Crisis, the World Economic Forum became the Global Power Elite’s front-group for promoting multiple agendas such as a global biosecurity system, digital ID passes, and central bank digital currencies — as part of a Fourth Industrial Revolution; a euphemism for a Techno-Feudalist technocracy.
WEF elites, who promote the Fourth Industrial Revolution, seek the eventual fusion of humans with machine as an enslaved workforce, data-mined, mind-controlled and shelled-out to perform tasks in vast hi-tech mega-cities ruled by the system of technocracy, or a scientific dictatorship on behalf of unseen super-rich oligarchs.
The Fourth Industrial Revolution is the fusion of computing chip technologies such as artificial intelligence, robotics, nanotechnology, 3-D printing, and telecommunications — with brain research and biological life and aims to alter biological functionality of all life-forms to fit the new ‘economic model’.
Under the rubric of a Fourth Industrial Revolution, the development of computing technologies are drawing all processes, transactions and relationships into digitally-mediated protocols. In other words, the deployment of AI governance systems is a creeping displacement of democratic administrative systems with technocracy.
Technocracy is a totalitarian form of government managed by technicians, engineers and scientists brainwashed to believe they are building unbiased equality-enhancing governance infrastructure, as the author of Technocracy Rising: The Trojan Horse of Global Transformation, Patrick Wood, described. When, in fact, technocracy transforms imperfect mechanisms of social control into turn-key totalitarianism for the benefit of unseen, super-rich oligarchies.
The selection of Yaccarino as Chief Twit means WEF has representation at Twitter.
Twitter’s addition to the X-Corp family of companies equips Musk with a big feedback media platform to promote himself as a free-thinking billionaire champion of free speech. By association, his tech companies can be marketed as positive solutions for the challenges besetting humanity. Yet, Musk’s companies are geared toward hi-tech data-mining of speech, movement and association in keeping with technocracy.
If you strip away Musk’s rhetoric, you can see his mindset, or worldview, with its naked logic revealed as oligarchic code: humans are product ripe for harvesting.
Given that Neurolink’s vision is to connect human brains to computers, it is poignant to realize that the pioneering work to map the human brain occurred under the CIA’s secret mind-control, brainwashing and indoctrination experiments, code-named MK-ULTRA. Poignant, because one of the far-reaching consequences of the top secret MK-ULTRA experiments was the finding that the test subjects in a closed system could only exert feedback ‘responses’ and were powerless to changed the design.
This finding is crucial, since humanity is at a critical juncture amid the exponential rise artificial intelligence, robotics and centralized technocratic systems of social control thanks in no small part to engineered ‘Great Reset’ to steer tech innovation.
At this critical juncture that will decide the pathways of human evolution, our species has the opportunity to out-supply the hi-tech systems of social control with bona fide solutions that counter the capacity of Global Power Elite to inflict such resets that alter the trajectory of the world’s structural forces in their favor. Crucially, Robert F. Kennedy warned that humanity needed to act effectively and quickly to counter the turn-key totalitarianism that is presently being fast-tracked to permanently enslave humanity once the ‘switch is flipped’. Especially, since social media and ChatGPT act as feedback platforms to teach AI to work, in essence, for the Global Power Elite.
The MK-ULTRA experiments sought to unlock the secrets of human physiology, psychology and the inner workings of the human mind in order to scientifically direct societies by weaponizing science, psychology and cutting edge inventions.
Under the rubric of cybernetics, MK-ULTRA technocratic planners, scientists, and psychiatrists worked to develop technical systems that would merge the control of humans with machines via the creation of communications networks, dubbed ‘the matrix’ — as the epic 2018 documentary The Minds of Men proves.
The MK-ULTRA experiments, which were officially conducted from 1953 to 1964, before being re-designated to MKSEARCH until 1972, included sensory torture, deprivation in isolation and re-programing of the mind, experimental psychotropic drugs, allergens and electric shock treatments, as well as mapping the human bio-electric circuitry, behavioral studies with remote control devices, and social conditioning with applied game theory.
These horrific, cruel and illegal experiments, which involved at least 149 sub-projects, were conducted on vulnerable humans, monkeys and rats, at over 130 institutions including hospitals, medical schools, universities, mental asylums, military facilities, and prisons across the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom.
In other words, the MK-ULTRA experiments were not about developing behavioral modification techniques to help the mentally sick people in asylums, or sociopaths in prisons. The underlying purpose of Project MK-ULTRA was a systematic study of how to reduce humans into fully manipulated goal-seeking devices, who would act against their own best interests to assist in the development of a sustainable system of social control across the globe. Project MK-ULTRA hacked humans for harvesting.
Since Elon Musk has claimed that his Tesla car and the Autonomous Pilot Project are efforts to reduce carbon emissions — by producing cleaner energy efficient transportation systems — a critical second look at the sustainable development claims promoted by the elite is necessary.
The global élite advance a utopian vision of ‘sustainable development’, with a ‘zero carbon’ global economy, that requires either a $90-$100 trillion investment, or even a colossal $270 trillion sum, depending on whose estimates you take.
‘But why?’ Are these proposals to invest gargantuan money numbers needed to sustainably develop the world? Why, when we’re told the previous three industrial revolutions caused the planet to warm dangerously, with too much emissions — especially CO₂ — and while ecosystems are collapsing? And how will precious finite resources be extracted, without engineered wars, mass dislocation and plunder?
Independent journalist, Cory Morningstar, who traced the magical rise of Greta Thunberg in her series The Manufacturing of Greta Thunberg, shows up the hypocrisy of efforts to market the Fourth Industrial Revolution as “sustainable” and “empowering,” while revealing its policies will clearly have the opposite effect.
It turns out, sustainable development is a euphemism for investment in infrastructure, hi-tech systems, and governance structures to achieve permanent social control.
Morningstar describes the capture of the environmental movement with its vanguard campaign — climate — by a NGO-Bioindustrial Complex, as a reworking of capitalism to construct a dystopian future for the permanent enslavement of humanity.
In her Manufacturing of Greta Thunberg, she Morningstar lays out the labyrinthine network of the NGO-Bioindustrial Complex, and its funding linkages to billionaire predatory philanthropists, transnational corporations and international institutions.
The NGO-Bioindustrial Complex is to ‘sustainable development’, what the Censorship-Industrial Complex is to ‘information hygiene’: orthodox technocracy.
It turns out that Elon Musk is something of a chip off his grandfather’s block, Joshua Norman Haldeman, who had been research director for Technocracy, Inc. of Canada. Joshua haldeman was born in a log cabin in Pequot, Minnesota on November 25, 1902 to John Elon Haldeman and Almeda Jane (Norman) Haldeman.
Mr Halderman was chairman of the Social Credit Party during the second world war, but after his unsuccessful bid for the national parliament in an attempt mainstream technocracy, he 1950 relocated his family to Pretoria, South Africa in 1950.
The technocracy movement emerged during the Great Depression, as a misplaced solution by scientists, engineers and technicians who blamed politicians for their part in building the war machines that laid waste to millions during World War I. The technocracy movement envisaged a utopia where a resource-based economy that allocated such resources via politically-free metrics calculated by scientists, engineers and technicians. Thus, a technocratic utopia requires massive computing power.
Musk is something of a chip off his old man’s block too.
According to Ashlee Vance in her book, Elon Musk: Tesla, SpaceX, and the Quest for a Fantastic Future, “The family owned one of the biggest houses in Pretoria thanks to the success of Errol’s engineering business,” a business that included “large projects such as office buildings, retail complexes, residential subdivisions, and an air force base.” At age 10, Elon talked his father into buying him a Commodore VIC-20. He learned to program and sold the source code for his first video game for $500 at age 12.
Famously, Musk tweeted, “Buying Twitter is an accelerant to creating X, the everything app”. Musician ‘Five Times August’ pithily tweeted in response, “Does X ‘the everything app’ eventually transition from app to microchip implant?”
Another Twitter account, Citizens of the Future retweeted, “maybe in 2030 range haha” with a graphic depicting the iconography of various New World Order tropes.
Twitter owns numerous tech companies that could build the ‘everything app’, X, as a reading of Inestopedia’s article “Top 5 Companies Owned by Twitter” indicates.
Gnip, an application programming interface (API) aggregation company; Magic Pony which developed neural network systems for image-related data expansion; mobile ad startup, TapCommerce; digital advertising platform, TellApart, that monitors usage across mobile and desktop devices; and TweetDeck, a social media dashboard for brand managers, publishers, and marketers to track Twitter accounts in real-time.
Thus, Twitter will help Musk make ‘X’ the everything app, which is like the Holy Grail super-app to centralize digital traffic flows connecting the feedback media platform with transactions covering shopping, utilities, finances, health, travel, security, education, and entertainment data to ‘clients’ such as marketers, investors and government agencies. As Whitney Webb pointed out in a recent PBD Podcast, Musk has stated that WeChat is the model for an everything app.
WeChat, the free messaging, calling and payments app, is owned by Tent Cent, which was among the BATs big tech Chinese companies that are locked in an AI equivalent of an ‘arms race’ with America’s FANG big tech companies, Facebook, Apple, Netflix and Google. So. it should be remembered that Musk was part of the ‘Paypal Mafia’.
Creepily, there is ‘no opt out’ with a 5G system, because a 5G world is a totally integrated telecommunications network built into cities, and is not simply limited to the mobile phone, said US Air Force brigadier-general Robert Spalding. Once payments and currencies go completely digital, as they have in many parts of China, and with surveillance cameras connected to AI driven facial recognition software, citizens become universally tracked harvested data products with near-zero privacy. Spalding, who is currently a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute told podcaster Patrick Bet-David, Google and Microsoft and other tech companies are helping China.
Whitney Webb said to Bet-David that it should be remembered that Musk is essentially an intelligence and military contractor and that he has postured about being against WEF agendas. And since data is the new oil, the tech billionaires such as Musk, Zuckerberg and Bezos will be like oil barrons, but as data magnates.
Moreover, Musk’s thinking behind X Corp, which re-registered from Delaware to Nevada on March 15 (Ides of March) 2023, appears to have sprung in part from a cogent argument proposed on twitter in December 2020 by an investment advisor.
In a series of tweets to accompany an article and video, Dave Lee proposed ‘X’ as a holding company of Tesla, SpaceX, Neuralink and the Boring Company, to facilitate a more efficient management of Musk’s time, resources and ideas.
Mr Lee emphasized that X’s mission is to ensure human survival and progress, and pitched such a potential move in altruisitic terms as big bets for humanity. To this uoptian end, Telsa would accelerate the planet’s transition to sustainable energy, while SpaceX could assist the species to forge a space-faring civilization, while Neuralink could protect humanity from general AI and the Boring Company was said to be capable of ending traffic congestion.
The investment advisor also suggested a biotech start-up and an education company.
Whether intentional or not, these suggestions that appeared to originate with an investment advisor, have provided potential cover for Musk should he encounter regulatory roadblocks for constructing a market dominating behemoth — allied with others Big Tech giants forging a cartel in a dystopian techno-feudalist technocracy.
Notably, the $44 billion acquisition of Twitter occurred with a $13 billion bank loan from Morgan Stanley and other banks. In addition, Musk raised an additional 7 billion dollars from equity investors, including Oracle co-founder Larry Ellison, Saudi prince Alwaleed bin Talal, and the cryptocurrency company Binance.
Taking Twitter private meant that Twitter Inc. no longer exists as a legal entity and therefore, relieves Musk of producing public annual reports specifically about Twitter.
Conveniently, Musk promotes simulation theory in which he expounds the notion that the reality we perceive is like a computer game. Such a theory is subversive because if enough people believe this ludicrous idea, it becomes an ideology and eventually its elements evolve into a cult mythology, that typically justify wars, mass dislocation and plunder — like a kind of fusion of Fortnight, Minecraft and EVE.
This simulation idea trivializes the real everyday suffering of humans across the world who live with the consequences of over-entitled billionaires, for whom regime changes are inflicted by the US-NATO Military Empire, in order for transnational corporations to gain resources faster than their less connected competitors.
In other words, the simulation paradigm is to a space faring civilization zeitgeist what the innovation of monotheistic religions were to kingdoms that wished to forge empires amid the technological innovation of iron swords.
Little wonder that aspects of Musk’s X Corp have been compared to ‘Sky-Net’, a reference to the Terminator movie in which Skynet is a fictional artificial neural network-based conscious group mind and artificial general super-intelligence system that serves as the antagonistic force that waged a machine war against humanity.
It’s like the Terminator is the prequel to The Matrix; and our ‘reality’ is the prequel. The Matrix depicts a dystopian future, with humanity trapped inside a simulated reality called the Matrix, that intelligent machines created to distract humans while using their bodies as an energy source, after the species lost a war against the machines.
Elon Musk speaks of a concern that AI could pose an existential risk to humanity, unless its trajectory is regulated. But, does he genuinely care about the permanent enslavement of masses of humans who will have little choice but to work for transnational corporations that control the hi-tech systems, resources and markets?
Because, Musk as a centi-billionaire, is allied with a cohort that is racing to develop AI, robots and technocracy protocols that will facilitate the fast-tracked displacement of masses of humans from employment. So, his tweets about another centi-billionaire, George Soros, distracts from the existential threat to humanity they are creating.
The ‘cool billionaire’ does not tweet about the US Federal Reserve being a money cartel of privately-owned credit manufacturing banks that charge extortionist fees — euphemistically called ‘interest’ — as the price to maintain its monopoly supply of credit. Musk doesn’t tweet the Fed maintains an artificial scarcity of cash to coerce households, businesses and governments to ‘borrow into existence’ such credit.
Nor does the ‘cool billionaire’ tweet about the stealthy agenda to control the world’s population with a two-pronged approach. One prong of this eugenics vision is limiting general population growth through widespread use of chemicals, nanoparticles and telecommunications technologies that together cause reproductive disorders, dysfunctions and diseases. The second prong of population control is about maintaining permanent social control through investment in a technological super-structure of global governance, SMART-Grid infrastructure and mega-cities.
And the ‘cool billionaire’ never tweets that the richest tier of humans don’t make the rich lists because their stupendous wealth would give the Monopoly Game away, since the top-tier super-rich are dynastic banking families. Musk doesn’t tweet about how the Global Power Elite avoids funding projects to identify the extent of oligarchic wealth accumulation and how to redirect such treasures without creating totalitarian systems of social control, because he is invested in building technocratic structures.
Musk’s X-Corp is one of many Big Tech companies forging a techno-feudalist empire.
Thus, Musk’s concern is that uncontrolled AI could take control from the global elite.
Yet, Musk and other centi-billionaires have not been resoundingly confronted with the glaring contradictions in their ‘save the planet’ posturing — even by Mr Carlson.
In a democracy, Carlson debated at University of California, 14 January 2006 — in the simpler times amid the 9/11 Wars — that people need a common place that they can refer to, to find out what happened in the news. He said no news reporter should take a stand on controversial issues, and that you will never get a newsroom reporting the news accurately when they all think the same on issues. He claimed newsrooms were comprised of upper middle class, coastal states and were 90% a liberal perspective.
The underlying issue, rather ironically, is that the Establishment Media, and many independent newsrooms, have internalized a conspiraphobic irrational fear since the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. In a 2018 podcast entitled, “Mockingbird 2.0: Propaganda, Fake News, and Censorship”, then-New York University Media, Communications and Propaganda Professor Mark Crispin Miller, stated that liberal intellectuals shied away from investigating deep state events within America since the JFK Assassination. Appearing with Ray McGovern, a former CIA analyst in the Reagan White House, Miller said the genius of the conspiracy’s planners was that they cleverly cast Lee Harvey Oswald as a deranged communist killer acting alone.
This ruse was designed to scare the political left away from investigating the flimsy cover-story at a time when liberal public intellectuals were still traumatized by the McCarthy-era hunt for communists in Cold War America. Miller pointed out that a left-liberal ideological ‘no-go zone’ to call-out U.S. home-grown terrorism had been cemented from the JFK Assassination onward. This was therefore, the watershed moment when the news media backed-off investigating big conspiracies. ‘Conspira-phobia’ is now endemic to newsrooms, academia and governments.
Yet, there is diverse voices across the podcast-scape that pose a growing threat to the conspira-phobic newsrooms, as especially with the proliferation of competing platforms such as Rumble, Odysee, and Epicube. A genuine alternative media world — such as The Corbett Report, Global Research, PBD Podcast, System Update, Dollar Vigilante TV, Mint Press News, Unlimited Hangout, The Highwire, Russell Brand, TruthStream Media, Media Monarchy, ZeeeMedia, The Last American Vagabond, ZeroHedge, Geopolitical Economy Report, Solari Report, and The Empire Files — all provide important critiques of the machinations of the ruling elites.
In other words, the rise of the Censorship Industrial Complex is an attempt to sabotage genuine efforts to counter propaganda, educate and build bridges.
The Global Power Elite are worried because so many have been actively using the internet to learn off one another, including them ‘pesky peasants’ on the so-called Alt Left and Alt-Right. Many have ideologically seen that the left-right paradigm boils down to the equivalent of juvenile siblings arguing over whether the knife or the fork is better. When, in fact, the squabblings exclude who controls the monetary system to fund the wars to fight over whether the cutlery will be washed by humans or robots.
In short, all wars boil down to a conflict over one issue: who will do the dishes?
To sum-up, this essay has explored the many possible and probable reasons why Fox News suddenly nixed Tucker Carlson’s prime time show in late April.
Indeed, there are perhaps as many vested interests with a reason to nix Tucker Carlson’s Fox show, as there were factions who conspired to whack JFK.
Carlson’s political ideology is that of a paleo-con, who persistently called out the Democrat and Republican Establishment for abandoning America’s middle class.
His stances pitched him against the ruling class and aligned him closely with Trump, who made the ‘deplorable’ middle-class his base.
Despite Tucker’s recent airing of the January 6th ‘Insurrection footage, as a Fox News host he did not fire his darts directly at the bulls-eyes of America’s true power elite, the dynastic banking families that control the Federal Reserve banking cartel. Like Twitter’s ‘rebel’ owner, Elon Musk, Mr Carlson has failed to target the ‘super-structure’.
A review of Carlson’s critics shows the Fox News host is not anti-war. The host believed America should remain the dominant hegemon. He considered Russia more culturally closer to America, and he viewed China as America’s prime threat.
But, where President Kennedy was trying to steer America away from its Pax Americana path of enforcing ‘peace, freedom and democracy’ through bombs, bullets and bayonets, Tucker Carlson is pitching that China is the number one enemy.
Therefore, as a paleo-con, Tucker Carlson has certainly been vocal about America sustaining its dominance, without using that expletive noun: ‘empire’.
In doing so, Carlson avoids articulating to his audience the predicament is not via policy errors. Rather, the rise of China was engineered by top American companies with the blessing of David Rockefeller of the dynastic banking and oil family.
In June 1980, Rockefeller met with the chairman of China International Trust and Investment Corporation, Rong Yiren, and senior executives of 300 major US corporations. And from the mid-1990s, Western tech-companies invested in R&D centers, supplied technology transfers, and skilled personnel. Scores of Fortune 500 companies established headquarters in Beijing's new Central Business District that not only kick-started China’s rise as an AI power, as independent journalist James Corbett laid out in his excellent 2015 report, “Deal With the Devil: How the Global Elite Re-colonized China.” The rise of China as the world’s factory, was not merely about outsourcing of cheap labour. China is a totalitarian test facility.
Carlson’s rhetoric to Trump that America should have kept better relations with Russia, was really pitched toward his view that China is the prime enemy. Tucker felt Putin could have been pulled closer to the United States, a view that was flattering to Trump. Tucker is not an anti-war voice, that many have deluded themselves to believe.
But, neither is Carlson a geo-political strategist. He appears to not even comprehend that what backs the FED US dollar is the US Military. Since the new oil is big data, who controls the territories, technologies and treasures to manufacture the chip, dominates the world and the ‘destiny’ of humans, artificial intelligence and robots.
At least, that’s the fight the Global Power Elite’s have locked the world into contesting.
Former CIA operative, ‘Andrew Bustamante’ claims that there is a time-window open to 2033, beyond which China will surpasses America economically, technically and militarily. ‘Bustamante’ told Shawn Ryan that the Russian-Ukraine War is not simply to run down Russia’s military supplies. The Russian-Ukraine War works as a ‘live’ logistics exercise in preparation for the likely war with China, that veteran journalist John Pilger anticipated in 2015. America’s war planners seek to weaken China’s ally.
However, as many have observed, including Tucker and Trump, the Russian-Ukraine War has pushed Russia and China closer together and swelled the number of nations that have applied to joins the BRICS economic super-bloc. This economic bloc competes with the Trans-Pacific Partnership, and the dozens of bilateral agreements signed during to trump Administration as a work-around to lacking an electoral mandate to sign the TPP economic super-bloc treaty.
The Russian-Ukraine War has also accelerated the drive to develop central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) across the globe. In other words, all the major and significant powers are acting in unison to forge larger economic blocs bound together with digital transaction control grids for total control over humanity.
Time will tell whether the noises Tucker makes with his mouth on the tweety-bird channel that President Donald Trump had turned into a ‘memo medium’ — will continue to be about America maintaining its hegemony as the dominant super-power.
Or, whether Mr Carlson shifts towards calling out the Global Power Elite, while exploring genuine life-affirming solutions, rather than peddling bellicose rhetoric.
And time will tell whether the noises we all make with our mouths will match our actions to humbly help make small, significant and spectacular waves to out-wit the Global Power Elite’s stealthy sabotage, sly subversion and slick ‘solutions’.
In any case, Tucker’s announced move to Twitter is fraught in the present cancel culture climate. He will likely encounter criticism if he behaves like Goldilocks trying out ‘the extremes’ in the podcasting-scape, as much as settling for moderate choices.
Coming soon in Part 2: “What happened in Nicaragua stays in Nicaragua”, I explore how in all of the coverage about Tucker “trust baby” Carlson, the part that almost never gets mentioned is the two times (that we know of) that the young Tucker travelled to Nicaragua during the Sandanista-Contra Civil War (1980 to 1988). Yet, in 1986, Tucker’s father Dick was appointed by Ronald Reagan as director of the U.S. Information Agency (USIA), the body that oversees government-funded media. This networks of media outlets were part of what The New York Times called a “worldwide propaganda network built by the CIA.”
Steve ‘Snoopman’ Edwards is a dissident journalist, who worked at indigenous broadcaster, Māori Television, for 14 years as an editor of news, current affairs and general programmes. His first job, as ‘Snoopboy’, was delivering the Auckland Star.
Editor’s Note: If we — my alter ego and I — have made any errors, please contact Steve Edwards, with your counter-evidence. e: steveedwards108[at]protonmail.com
